Would your beliefs change if the words good and evil ceased to exist?

Answer 1

No, since benefit and detriment are better concepts.

Answer 2

Removing the words will not change anything - people would just come up with a new word to describe the thoughts, feelings, and actions they experience. If good and evil ceased to exist, life would be pretty dang boring for sure.

Answer 3

i'm not likely non secular in any way, (nonetheless i'm not athiest). I wasn't stated in a non secular way fairly, nonetheless I do have faith in a great being of a few variety. No, i don't think the Harry Potter sequence is in any way evil. Come on, it fairly is a e book. (or to be precise 6 books so some distance). in my opinion, i don't think of the books are evil, as they are purely Fiction and fable. i don't see how they might impact you in any undesirable way or make you do something incorrect. And the books emphasize the best. good? Harry Potter is noble, sturdy, brave and variety. Hermonie is devoted and hardworking. And Ron...properly he's inaccurate. Dumbledore is the essence of fantastic. those every person is the winners of the story, the conquerors. particular, Voldemort is evil, yet observe he has been thwarted at each and every turn. the ethical of the story is that good will triumph over evil in time, no count how overpowering evil looks. How can that be evil? purely my opinion, and that i might like to hearken to from somebody who believes them to be evil.

Answer 4

If the -concepts- of good and evil didn't exist my beliefs might change in some ways. But on the whole they wouldn't because they are based on the teachings of Christ, which I see as basically how to treat myself and others and how to relate to the world and existence in general.

I think in terms of beneficial versus harmful, the results of an action, philosophy or idea rather than whether society sees it as "good" or "evil". If that makes any sense...

Answer 5

Since good and evil are both relative and subjective, their meanings are probably not connected to the things I "believe" are true; and since my "beliefs" are based heavily on facts rather than on desire, I am less dependent upon the need of "belief" and I lean far more toward being convinced that my conclusions are either valid beyond doubt or highly plausible. I rely on the strength of as many sets of satisfied conditions as I see in order to formulate a conclusion, each of which stands well above the level of any single belief by the acceptance of a preconceived faith.

I don't think the terms of good or evil make a dang bit of difference in how I decide what is empirically true or obviously in agreement with a reasonable picture of an actual reality.

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb62/Randall_Fleck/WKClifford_GIF.gif
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb62/Randall_Fleck/Worth_reading_mine02_GIF.gif

[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.

Answer 6

Somehow my beliefs will change primarily because good and evil truly exist (as written in the Bible and in reality).

Answer 7

Good & evil existed long before words existed. Without evil we would never have known good.

It is this paradox on which God built the foundation of mankind's free will to choose.

God Bless,

AAD

Answer 8

No, Good and Evil are only words that define a state of being.

Answer 9

No, because they'd have synonyms.
Such as great; malicious.

There's no way to avoid something by pretending the word doesn't exist.

Answer 10

That was the condition of Adam and Eve before they partook of the tree of knowledge. It is like an infant who knows neither good or evil.

Answer 11

No because good and evil truly don't exist.
Between concepts of absolute good and evil stands man, neither good nor evil. We are like lightening, we are the results of the balancing of forces.