2007-09-21 15:59:03 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This question was over-the-top and mainly meant to get a rise out of Republicans, but I did find out something interesting...almost all of them made the same ridiculous argument...that if someone questions the use of of private contractors (who really are accountable to NO ONE regardless of guilt or innocence), that must mean they don't care when civilians get killed by terrorists?
I really don't understand how you bozos even manage to get your pants on in the morning.
2007-09-22 02:55:29 · update #1
Yes it is. Especially when those civilians are aiding or abbetting terrorists
2007-09-21 16:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, it is not wise of you to make such statements without the least shred of evidence. Nothing has been proven in the blackwater case. There have been numerous accusations of military guys killing civilians as well and most have been thrown out after any investigation. My opinion: it is possible that some of these accusations are the result of officials trying to be overly careful due to the anti-war pressure
2007-09-21 23:03:58 · answer #2 · answered by justin b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I served in Iraq with the Army, private security loses more people than any branch of the military to terrorist attacks, you don't win a war by being mr nice guy to terrorist... if they fired on people there was a good reason, don't trust the media, the librals side with the terrorists... becuase it wins votes to the democrats...
2007-09-21 23:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by JpCreation101 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow..snarky sarcasm is such a powerful tool in solving the worlds issues...
Actually, it's wonderfully wise to be able to use a private army, for all the aforementioned reasons, you think that the Fundamental Islamic terrorists care about the private citizens they blow up, torture, or rape randomly?
Why don't you use that insightful intellect, that you display to solve the problems of the world instead of just being a naysayer?
2007-09-21 23:11:53 · answer #4 · answered by sirtanaka 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You get attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. These "corporations" replace US troops. No one cries about civilians killed by the foreign terrorists and agents that are going into Iraq to prevent a peaceful democracy, why is that? Lack of balls?
2007-09-21 23:02:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are correct on one word of your question. Leader.... Can you give our readers the definition? You are falling for the line of bullshit along a few American's in the minority.
Think past your brain stem and contribute to the subject.
2007-09-21 23:08:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I guess everytime you get a boil on your butt you blame the President Huh? get a life this was a isolated incident that you don't even know what happend except what you hear in the media..Everybody is a no it all, when you really don't know anthing..
2007-09-21 23:11:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
another liberal convicting people before there is all of the facts in. Arent you the same people who complain about gitmo and how it is unfair.
And where is your liberal outcry for all the civilians killed by insurgents. I always hear you libs run to their defense saying they are just freedom fighters when they do it.
Take if from someone who was there it is not always as clear as the news tries to make it. I was shot by a insurgent dressed as a civilian who was hidding amongst women and children. When will you wake up to this fact
2007-09-21 23:03:01 · answer #8 · answered by Geoff C 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do you mean The Black Water Safety patrol.
Or something like that
I think it needs to be investigated
By a 3rd Party.
2007-09-21 23:06:03 · answer #9 · answered by mw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only consequences I know of is that Bush has successfully alienated the Iraqis and made the Malaki government even more of a US-led puppet government.
2007-09-21 23:02:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋