Obviously someone filled them out and the clerk is either lying or joking.
I'm just amused by the picture attached to the article, showing Chambers with what looks like a halo behind his head thanks to that fan.
2007-09-21 08:04:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I told you it was Mr. Bush... he just came out from hiding...
Anyway, this case is getting freakier and freakier by the day. Muahahahaha...
***
There's just some things in life that are stranger than fiction. Truth unveils without a moment of hesitation and 'poof' there goes the biggest blow to the big ego of mankind...
2007-09-21 09:11:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I examine some cool stuff in String concept approximately how the great bang in no way befell, and asymmetry become accountable for the start of the universe. some creationists have published some interesting arguments against evolution, additionally. they're all variety of a million/2-baked, whether this is stable to stay spectacle on the theories revolving around our lives and our spirituality. i think of that some ought to declare: "God is a theory to outstanding for the human concepts to appreciate." my own own answer feeds off of this. start up with "comprehension" itself. we can't comprehend the place our comprehension got here from without thinking as our comprehension and selfless of something that ought to stand in the way of that thinking; for this reason, we would desire to dismiss the comparable (comprehension). we are at a juxtaposition. in case you prefer to comprehend who God is and the place God comes from, you quite need to think of completely as God previous to thinking with your individual reading expertise. God is nearly a guarded and precis theory, in many senses. no less than, God is in basic terms too complicated to appreciate in His entirety, for human beings. So, we in basic terms won't be in a position to respond to each question approximately Him. attempting to attain this is the comparable as attempting to respond to the questions for Him, without being particular of His contract, i assume. comments? 8)
2016-11-06 01:32:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by apley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You said it "someone" . A human trying to be funny. Possibly getting in trouble with God, since the person claim to be God.
2007-09-21 08:13:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by geessewereabove 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just another publicity-seeking nut case. When religion is involved, the nut cases on all sides come out.
I wonder if they paid the filing fee too? Would god dirty his/her hands with filthy lucre?
2007-09-21 08:03:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by BAL 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be inadmissible and require proper identification of evidence. The chain of evidence rules require that the proponent of the evidence show that the evidence has not been tampered with.
2007-09-21 08:11:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Atrum Animus AM 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is HYSTERICAL! Thanks for sharing. I live in Corpus Christi so I'll have to keep an eye on this one to see which law office was involved in the second response.
2007-09-21 08:06:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by KAL 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know, the same way christmas presents magically appear under the tree?
2007-09-21 08:03:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by 006 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Thats just cool. God likes us talking about Him even if all that is nonsense,ya know
2007-09-21 08:08:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by christian_me 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sometimes God works through others to get results...
2007-09-21 08:05:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by goodkharma333 3
·
2⤊
0⤋