Not really. Ethanol is derived from plant materials and fuel cells often use electricity
2007-09-21 07:54:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jenny Joanna 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The main argument against ethanol always has been that producing it uses up almost as much energy as the finished product contains. This is called ethanol’s “net energy balance.” Most ethanol facilities use one unit of energy to make about 1.6 units. Through various efficiencies, incredibly, Corn Plus has improved that ratio to about one to six.
And the proof is right here:
http://www.connectbiz.com/stories/moonshine.html
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/12/ethanol_plant_t.html
2007-09-21 08:43:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh yeah. In fact it takes 1.29 units of energy to make 1 unit of ethanol. Ethanol absorbs water and breaks down very easily so it can not go down the pipelines and must be shipped by train or truck.
http://petroleum.berkeley.edu/papers/patzek/CRPS416-Patzek-Web.pdf
Here is what the expert patzek says. This is a quote
According to his research, more fossil energy is used to produce ethanol than the energy contained within it.
This is the article
http://www.coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/0305/patzek.html
2007-09-21 07:41:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by $1,539,684,631,121 Clinton Debt 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
ethanol - yes
fuel cells - not in the fuel cell itself, but fossil fuels maybe used to create the fuel used in the fuel cells.
2007-09-21 15:12:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beacon 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
In the making of the containers it is made and stored in and transportation. Also the heating for the fermentation cycle and distilling for ethanol.
2007-09-21 08:55:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by RomeoMike 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It can be but doesn't necessarily have to be.
2007-09-21 07:32:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋