There are elements of both competition and cooperation in both capitalism and communalism. However, having said that, I think the ideal situation would be a perfect communal society in which individual freedoms were respected. However, since we don't yet live in that ideal world, capitalism is the best realistic alternative.
2007-09-21 06:56:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Open Heart Searchery 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are both compatible, with Cooperation being the one that is more sought after. You can have Competition without being a total tool to others. But we would all prosper with a little Cooperation.
2007-09-21 06:58:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by dlbt21 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Capitalism!
2007-09-21 06:57:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Capitalism, it aims to be the Microsoft of the religious industry.
I exclude cooperation because they don't seek to cooperate, that would entail sharing knowledge and accepting knowledge. They believe that nothing outside of it has any value, so accepting is clearly not going to happen.
2007-09-21 06:58:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd say communism, since both that and Christianity seem to champion mediocrity. They both discourage being able to advance oneself in this world, or recognize social stratification.
2007-09-21 07:33:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communalism should be more compatible with Christianity.
The early church practiced a form of socialism or communism depending on how you classify it.
2007-09-21 10:59:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The very concept of Christianity is free will. There is room in either.
Unless you meant communism. They wouldn't allow any of them.
2007-09-21 06:52:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋