*Wipes tears from eyes*
Notice that the "response" has not yet been subjected to forensic examination. Also notice that the response is classical Xian though and is not consistent with Biblical teaching.
2007-09-21 03:24:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well now that there's written proof of god in the form "miraculously" found at the clerk's office, perhaps a judge can submit an order to show cause. If god doesn't turn up, then a bench warrant should be issued for his arrest. The senator might actually win this one.
2007-09-21 10:29:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did anyone notice that, in the 2006 picture that was shown with that article, the fan behind Mr Chambers makes him appear to have a halo around his head. Excellent choice of photos, Yahoo!
2007-09-21 10:28:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Maureen 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's exactly that.
The initial lawsuit was made to prove a point about anyone being able to sue anyone.
The response from "god" points out to me at least a couple christians have a sense of humor.
2007-09-21 10:19:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
Yep...and its got people talking which is what I think the point was.
Besides, people like Pat Roberson say they hear from God all the time. Why would you be surprised?
2007-09-21 10:24:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Funny god mentions free will in his response to a lawsuit but neglected to mention it in the bible. Whoopsies!
2007-09-21 10:20:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by glitterkittyy 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
Obviously it did not come from god, because the "free will" argument has too many holes in it.
2007-09-21 10:20:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
rebel the devil has file way more paperwork at the courthouse
2007-09-21 10:25:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It just goes to show that there are kooks everywhere .
2007-09-21 10:23:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Um, yeah, it's a joke.
2007-09-21 10:55:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋