Are Pauls words equal to the words of GOD ?

Answer 1

I've never claimed that they are.

Answer 2

I like your question. I was about to leave, until I looked at this question.
The quick way to answer that is yes. Why would the answer be yes?
What the people had never known is that God's name is also Paul.
It's very unique concept of writing.
The writer was a man who's name is Paul. That man used his hand to do the writing for God, who has the same name as the man, Paul. (Now how would I possibly know that God's name is Paul) (mysterious huh).
Anyway, You have an author whose name is Paul, and a writer whose name is also Paul.
Some clues: Paul wrote , my hand is doing the writing, but these are God's words I'm writing.
Also, notice that some of the verses Paul wrote, "I Paul" What people had not known is that every time Paul wrote "I Paul", he was actually writing, "I God".
Paul's hand was writing God's words, not his own words.
If people would read the Old testament when God spoke to the Son of man and read what Paul wrote, then you should notice that God would tell the Son of man the same thing that Paul would be telling a certain person he was writing to.
Paul was actually writing to people who'll be on the earth in the last days, not during the time he wrote the letters.
Also, what people had not known is that some of the various people Paul wrote to is actually the same person. He used various names for the same person so that readers wouldn't know who he was actually writing to.
If people could have understood who Paul was actually writing to and why, then they would have figured out a long time ago who the mediator would actually be, not whom the people have been erroneously taught to believe.
Why does Paul's writing look similar to the things God said to the Son of man in the old testament/ because Paul was actually writing to the Son of man.
Have people not noticed that Jesus never returned under a new name. The old testament says God's son will return under a new name.
What would be the new name God's son appears under in the last days?
Why would Paul write, Timothy my son? Paul was writing God's words, not his own.
It's true that God isn't the master of confusion, that's because it's the people who is.

Answer 3

Paul's words in the Bible were written under the direction and inspiration of the Holy Spirit are the words of God. God used Paul's deep knowledge of the law of Moses to explain and elaborate the diffirence between law and grace and faith and works. Paul was God's chosen apostle of the gospel of grace, of peace, of Christ and of the kingdom.

Answer 4

Happily, we have God’s own Word to guide us on this. “You know this first,” said the apostle Peter, “that no prophecy of Scripture springs from any private interpretation. For prophecy was at no time brought by man’s will, but men spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit.”—2 Peter 1:20
For a fact, time and time again the Bible stresses that it is “the word of God.” In the 176 verses of Psalm 119 alone this point is alluded to 176 times! All honor was to go to God. It was his book, not theirs.

Answer 5

When Paul states his opinions, it is not the same as God words.

Paul did not think that a woman should be teaching a man. That was his opinion based on the times he lived.

Paul's opinion on slavery has been taken out of context, he did not endorse slavery, but realized that was a way of life 2000 years ago. Again that was his opinion.

Answer 6

Yes cause God inspired the word of God.

Answer 7

The Bible interprets itself.

"All scripture is inspired."
Therefore, Paul's words are those inspired by God Himself.

Answer 8

Yes, if Paul is god.

Answer 9

The bible is God's word written thru me by him. Every word is what he wants you to know. Every word is from him. He tells you what others said to make you understand but it comes from him.

Answer 10

No Even Closee..your comparing a human with the one who created you...think my friend use your brain

The Quran recognizes the fact that Jesus had no human father, but this does not make him the son of God, or God himself. By this criterion, Adam would have been more entitled more entitled to be the son of God, because he had neither a father nor a mother, so the Quran draws attention to the miraculous creation of both in the following verses; " truly the likeness of Jesus, in God's sight is as Adam's likeness; He created him of dust, then He said upon him, 'Be' and hi was. (Al-Imran 3:59)

The Quran rejects the concept of Trinity God the Father, God the son, God the Holy Spirit - as strongly as it rejects the concept of Jesus as the son of God. This is because GOD IS ONE. Three cannot be one. The Quran addresses Christians in the following verses from the Surrah entitled "An-Nisaa" (The Women)

People of the Book, do not go beyond the bounds in your religion, and say nought as to God but the Truth. The messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was only the messenger of God, and his word (Fulfilment of his word (Fulfilment of His command, through the word "Be", for the creation of Jesus) that he committed to Mary, and a spirit originating from Him (was given life by God). So believe in God and His Messengers, and say not 'Three'. Refrain, better is for you. God is only one God. Glory be to him-that He should have a son! To Him belongs all that is in the Heavens and in the Earth; God suffices for a guardian.

Answer 11

No paul are the intepretor and the conductor only