2007-09-20 23:40:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
a bit of both...
2007-09-21 21:44:28 · answer #1 · answered by yyy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I don't allow people to walk all over me then I have nothing to be vindictive about.
2007-09-21 10:18:50 · answer #2 · answered by Sidetracked0260 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's two different things.
Being vindictive to me is evil.
Vengeance is mine said the Lord.
Let Him take care of it.
I let a few things pass by that aren't
important.
2007-09-21 06:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by elliebear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, I'm not vindictive nor do i let anyone walk over me... I instead, try to be as open minded as I can and not judge anyone....I also try to be as honest as I can be and strong in my own personal beliefs.... I don't really relate to your question...
2007-09-21 06:45:27 · answer #4 · answered by ░▒▓► Aqua Fires 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither! being vindictive is a waste of energy and being walked all over is a waste of life.
Be firm, but willing to listen and learn.
Cheers :-)
2007-09-21 07:55:29 · answer #5 · answered by thing55000 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm vindictive to the point of being diabolical!!!!
2007-09-21 12:15:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not vindictive, but I am assertive and I nip problems in the bud.
2007-09-21 06:47:22 · answer #7 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is the logical fallacy of "false dichotomy." There are many, many options besides the two you mention. So your answer is "no" and "no" -- I do not allow myself to be used as a doormat, nor do I stoop to petty acts of revenge.
2007-09-21 08:45:08 · answer #8 · answered by kill_yr_television 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither one, actually. You can be fair yet firm, and the only way people will walk over you is if you let them.
2007-09-21 06:44:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Why would you think there's only one or the other?
2007-09-21 21:39:21 · answer #10 · answered by ds37x 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋