There's clearly some kind of conspiracy shown by the answers to my question. Like "how can we as mere humans answer anything about anything, humans are imperfect but God is perfect!" or "scientists are being bullied to what other older scientists believe" or "the scientific method is flawed, but I don't know why!"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070918143713AAqOSr7&r=w
2007-09-20 11:45:42 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
by dancing of course, all problems are solved by a good two-step
lost.eu/21618
2007-09-20 11:55:41 · answer #1 · answered by Quailman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blunt force trauma to the head is the only way to stop the intelligent from spreading.
2007-09-20 11:51:25 · answer #2 · answered by Michael 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
never. particular, *some* scientists are anti-faith (Richard Dawkins, to illustrate), interior an identical way that *some* non secular every person is anti-technology (like coaching smart layout as "technology"). on the entire, in spite of the undeniable fact that, the component to bear in suggestions is that technology can't prepare or disprove the lifestyles of God, or the different supernatural being. "Supernatural" ability "above nature", and technology is *all approximately* nature! What technology can (and does) do is disprove lots of the claims appropriate to the universe that non secular persons and establishments make. to illustrate, technology everyday that the solar, and not the earth, replaced into on the centre of the photograph voltaic gadget (as non secular establishments claimed). And this upsets some non secular human beings via fact of dogmatic ideals appropriate to genuinely the, unchanging fact of (to illustrate) the bible. technology is in no way dogmatic; it continuously must be open to the potential of a different (and better) rationalization for any stated phenomena. in the present day the theory of gravity ... the next day, who's accustomed to? faith is very mostly dogmatic; if the bible stated that the earth replaced into created in 7 days, and individuals believed that 1000 years in the past, then how can or not it particularly is incorrect now? the respond, of direction, is that it replaced into incorrect then too, we purely did not comprehend yet.
2016-10-19 06:12:08 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would point out that science is merely indifferent to religion. sorry about your planet, but that hyperspace bypass is really important... ;)
it's easy to see how some people confuse indifference with antipathy, not so easy to see how to change their minds. oh well.
2007-09-20 11:55:51 · answer #4 · answered by vorenhutz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋