English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What's good for the Pilgrim-American is good for the Mexican.

2007-09-20 10:55:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

16 answers

It's because White people think that no one's rules ever apply them, even when they break their own rules.

It's White Supremacy, a mental disorder based on criminal behavior and criminal culture.

2007-09-24 07:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

OK, so you want to break treaties--no problem. You do realize that breaking a treaty that was signed at the end of hostilities is an Act of War in and of itself--right?

And since you could not stop us from marching into your country then, you have absolutely no chance of victory now.

So I have a question for you:

What will you Mexicans do when the neutron bombs start to rain down death from above? Pray? Cry? or wish that you had not awakened the sleeping giant?

Put another way: How will you stop us from rolling tanks into Mexico City? Protest? Cry? Snivel? And how will you stop us from forcing you to sell us your Oil at 1/8 of its value as a reparation? Is that silence that I hear?

2007-09-20 20:13:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

amigo you need to read history and lay off the carona. Immigrants who came to america in the 1600s found a hostile land that they made a succes. You have not make a success out of mexico but have squandered and wasted its natural resources. Can you name anything that mexican technology has created, of course not. The pilgrims did not sneak into north America they fought and died for it and cut trees, raised children and worked for its success. mexicans could have done the same for their country but they have chosen to be parasites off the backs of the american taxpayer. Have a nice day amigo and go home.

2007-09-20 20:24:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Yes, the pilgrims mistreated Indians and claimed thier land for themselves. Were we right in doing that? NO. Did we apologize ? YES. Our government trys to maintain a great relationship with the Native American society. That's why they can have their own rules on their tribal territory and other government benefits. We were not in the right when we did that, just like Mexicans would be in the wrong if they pulled that on us.

2007-09-20 18:20:03 · answer #4 · answered by cheezbawl2003 4 · 4 3

Unfortunately, your presumtion is incorrect. A rephrasing of your argument might go thusly: someone broke into my grandmother's house and assaulted her 30 years ago, therefore it is acceptable for me to break into the house of that person's son and assault them.

The reason this is wrong is that neither I nor that person's son were involved in the original attack.

Finally...the Native Americans did not have sufficient technology or numbers on their side.

What you describe is an invasion, which would classify people trying to take land currently inside the borders of the United States as "enemy combatants". I doubt I need to remind you what generally happens to "enemy combatants" these days....

2007-09-20 18:19:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 4 3

At least Americans made treaties, Mexico simply took-over Indian lands w/o a second thought.

2007-09-20 18:02:18 · answer #6 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 4 4

Oy tu gusano ,(oh u maggot)u want ur southwest back from u.s.a. boo f-ing hoo....waaa...waaaa...remember u gave us the land because u owed us 19 million dollars and offered land instead of pesos...hahaha even than it was ignorant country with ignorant people.remember the alamo? well after that victory ur brave leader and general gave us texas so we would not capture the great general...hahaha what a joke.U better try shoving ur neighbors to the south cause u.s.a wont give you diddily squat.u suck all our social resources now u want the land?than we what,need pay u to live there so u dont starve.go back to mexico if ur illegal.assimulate to america or leave.

2007-09-20 18:12:06 · answer #7 · answered by WILLIAM A 1 · 2 4

It seems to me that was already tried twice. Once in 1836, and once in the war of 1846-1848.
Somehow I don't think a 3rd try would yield any better results than the first 2 did.

2007-09-20 18:14:46 · answer #8 · answered by chuck_junior 7 · 5 3

Tuna.....god I love you!!!! That was so precious!!!!!!

Ya.....what's good for the goose is good for the gander....only the strong survive.

Mexicans....you want LAND.....uninhabited, unpopulated LAND, you go for it. Problem is....I'm not seeing any come here for LAND....they are comming for JOBS and MONEY and FREEBIES.

Also....lets not forget 1 major thing here......when this land was uninhabited and unsettled....all the darn Mexicans had to do is cross the border.....they didn't. Took people crossing over oceans to do it. What's your excuse? It was there.....always there....ripe for the picking....easy access...and you didn't. Sorry dude....snooze you loose.

2007-09-20 18:15:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

No, they can't. But why would they really? I thought Mexico was a horrible place? I cannot understand why they are wanting to turn this country into another Mexico. Stupid is what it is, sorry.

2007-09-20 18:32:17 · answer #10 · answered by ▪ώhiteĝırl▪® 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers