English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you are now not physically living in this "Holy Land", what does that mean? You are thus living in an "Unholy Land" ? or what? Will Jerusalem get crowded with 6.5 billion humans living there to be wholly in the "Holy Land" ? Hmmm Can modern DNA science shrink us all down alot to fit us all into the little Holy Land ?

I saw on TV earlier today on a 700 "Club the infidels" or something close to that, where the Club Leader said it would be terrible to divide the Holy Land Jerusalem into two or three parts. He also said that if the USA allows this, we will get the "wrath" or "judgment" from of his idea of God.

Our planet earth is shooting through space fast, now countless miles AWAY from the sacred absolute SPACE location of Jesus' Incarnate here in AD30 ... Should we space-rocket- travel back to the Holy Space there ?

I am sick of these so confused human ideas. What does Jesus now say on this? I said JESUS, not a Bible quote on what Jesus might have said then.

Peace !

2007-09-20 06:59:13 · 7 answers · asked by ? 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

BIBLE WORD ANALYSIS: In the Old Testament, (OT) the word "land" is found about 1700 times; "lands" 43 times; "holy" 425 times. The land(s) to holy ratio is there 1743/425 or 4.10

In the New Terstament, (NT) the word "land" is found about 50 times; "lands" 4 times and "holy" 175 times. The land(s) to holy ratio is there 54/175 or 0.31

Thus, the much better NT mentions the Holy/land(s) ratio 4.10/0.31 or 13.2 times better than the inferior OT

"For Land sakes !" ? or for "Holy Truth !!!" ?

Is not ALL of the earth God's ? or God's foot-stool? He will not like it if you try to steal a chuck out of his foot-stool and sell it for money ! Count the great cost of "This land is mine and land-mined !"

2007-09-20 10:25:23 · update #1

7 answers

Wholly land grab is the most accurate.

[ The Davidic Empire, which archaeologists once thought as incontrovertible as the Roman, is now seen as an invention of Jerusalem-based priests in the seventh and eighth centuries B.C. who were eager to burnish their national history. The religion we call Judaism does not reach well back into the second millennium B.C. but appears to be, at most, a product of the mid-first....
Some twelve to fourteen centuries of "Abrahamic" religious development, the cultural wellspring that has given us not only Judaism but Islam and Christianity, have thus been erased. Judaism appears to have been the product not of some dark and nebulous period of early history but of a more modern age of big-power politics in which every nation aspired to the imperial greatness of a Babylon or an Egypt. Judah, the sole remaining Jewish outpost by the late eighth century B.C., was a small, out-of-the-way kingdom with little in the way of military or financial clout. Yet at some point its priests and rulers seem to have been seized with the idea that their national deity, now deemed to be nothing less than the king of the universe, was about to transform them into a great power. They set about creating an imperial past commensurate with such an empire, one that had the southern heroes of David and Solomon conquering the northern kingdom and making rival kings tremble throughout the known world. From a "henotheistic" cult in which Yahweh was worshiped as the chief god among many, they refashioned the national religion so that henceforth Yahweh would be worshiped to the exclusion of all other deities. One law, that of Yahweh, would now reign supreme. ]

2007-09-20 07:01:26 · answer #1 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 1 1

You seem to think that all of the six and a half billion people living on earth want to live in the "holy Land". Count me out , I wouldn't give you two cents per square mile for it.
Just exactly what does the United States have to do with the "holy land" ? Why do you say that America shouldn't allow it ? Why does America have to do everything , even if it's not our land , or our problem ?
Jesus has nothing to say , He hasn't said anything since he was executed a couple of thousand years ago .
Pease on you too .

2007-09-20 14:16:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the man on the 700 club was quoting the bible....

God said He did not want the holy land parted, but to remain as one land....and that any one who would violate his will would be fought against....

Joel 3:2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and [for] my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.

the land was reserved for the jews....this tiny spot....the rest of the world is free for everyone else...God needs the jews all there in one place...so he can return to them as messiah...and restore them..(Zech 8:7)

you will see that fighting over the land is wrong..since it is holy...and even if they divide it up...it will just destroy it further and there will still be no peace.

Jesus would agree with the bible...

2007-09-20 14:41:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am happy about your new electronic bible giving you all these numbers, but why no quotes. Jesus and his apostles, not to mention the prophets answer your question well enough. They're reply would be much like I said cause God said to me. Here it is for today. Damascus will fall soon.

2007-09-21 01:35:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Only God our Father has the answer to all those questions and the 700 Club Leader is only guessing in my opinion. Yes, he is a nice enough person, but again, he is only guessing.

2007-09-21 13:03:51 · answer #5 · answered by Cindy Roo 5 · 0 0

Holy cow! Your question is really long.

2007-09-20 14:06:11 · answer #6 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 0 0

I don't know.

2007-09-26 17:36:31 · answer #7 · answered by smkeller 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers