2007-09-19 12:41:38 · 6 answers · asked by Mari 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Every country with non separation he is usually also the political ruler, being a military. In democratic ones military force is under the political command
2007-09-19 12:52:51 · answer #1 · answered by . 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The separation of powers as stated in the constitution refer to a balancing of powers between the Judicial, Legislative and Executive branches of government.
Each branch plays a role in the military, the Executive's role just happens to be "Commander in Chief of the armed forces."
In short...it is not an example of the separation of powers at all...it is simply the supreme law of the land according the the Constitution of the United States of America.
2007-09-19 19:57:06 · answer #2 · answered by jw 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have the president in charge of the military but only Congress can declare war. Those two things together make a Separation of Powers.
2007-09-19 20:01:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. it eliminates the possibility of a military person siezing control of the Military.
2007-09-19 20:55:59 · answer #4 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who do you want to be in charge of the US military? Read Sun Tzu.
2007-09-19 19:52:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a civilian running things not a military person.
2007-09-19 19:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by InSeattle 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋