English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Love of Money = Love of OIL

The entire nation supports this love.

.

2007-09-19 12:14:44 · answer #1 · answered by wwhy 3 · 2 0

Despite what you may think, this was NEVER about oil!!! How many troops do we have around areas where they ship the oil out? How about where the oil is produced? If it was about oil, the troops would be there and not in cities, getting shot at.

2007-09-19 12:27:33 · answer #2 · answered by Mark S 6 · 0 0

Leaders desire to have a stable conflict under their belt for the checklist. infantrymen be killed? They joined up did no longer they? they're keen to kill others are not they? If the armed service chiefs might tell the government that they are going to in user-friendly terms combat to safeguard the native land and to no longer faux that politically disliked countries pose a risk which they do no longer then...

2016-10-19 03:37:03 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Iran is a little more powerful than Iraq was. Plus, it's more of a theocracy of one denomination, so the vast majority of Iranians could be rallied against American forces if we did invade.

2007-09-19 12:15:52 · answer #4 · answered by Skunk 6 · 2 0

No Saudi Arabia,its so flat perfect for tanks to cross,with unknown potential oil reserves.

2007-09-19 12:27:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Which Christian crusade?
The leadership in Iran is corrupt and sick.
A good example of fanatic Muslim politics.

2007-09-19 12:17:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It won't be oil that supplies the fires of hell.

Accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and savior before it is too late. He loves you and does not want you to perish. Yet, he loves you so much he wants you to make the decision to follow him.

You have the choice to follow the devil or God. One offers eternity in torment and the other eternity in paradise. God left the choice to you.

He wants us to follow him because we love him and want to be his children. If we didn't have choice, could it not be said we are slaves. He doesn't want slaves, he wants children. That is how he made us. His children. Mankind chose to be slaves.

2007-09-19 12:19:28 · answer #7 · answered by heiscomingintheclouds 5 · 2 1

It kind of seems that way, doesn't it? Scary that a government would use a religion to justify their greed.

2007-09-19 12:30:05 · answer #8 · answered by Ahmad H 4 · 0 0

I'm All for it!

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."

"Veni Viti Vichi"

† 'God Bless' †

2007-09-19 12:15:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It's already in the planning stages.

2007-09-19 12:13:05 · answer #10 · answered by chazzychef 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers