What explanation do creationists have for the fossils of Australopithecus and other Homo species that are now?

Question

extinct?

Do they think each of these species were created separately? Or that Satan somehow made up fossils and put them in the earth - as well as their ancestors - allowing us to use multiple dating techniques (skewing all the results) to determine the chronologic order of their existance, in an attempt to deceive us from the truth? Or that scientists are secretly just trying to disprove creation because they are angry at God and there aren't really any fossils? I'm running through different possibilities and I'm wondering if you have any ideas.

Answer 1

"Genetic mutations are, certainly, random..." nicely, no longer likely. they're rather somewhat constrained. Which mutations take place at any specific time is unquestionably random; yet which sorts of mutations *can* take place isn't random in any respect. Any single mutation that brings a extensive developmental replace in one "step" is probably to bring about an embryo which will by no skill correct improve, and if it does have the means to enhance and be born, many times heavily limits that organism's reproductive opportunities. additionally, the developed shape of DNA (which developed to be what that's because of the fact it is incredibly stable, yet no longer suitable, at correcting errors and proscribing mutations) limits the sorts of mutations that would take place. I basically element that out because of the ridiculous claims of a few creationists approximately an ape giving start to a human, or that we would desire to continuously assume to work out "crocoducks" or another such nonsense. neither is in any respect possible given what all of us comprehend approximately DNA and embryonic progression. Small adjustments from mutations can and do take place, and acquire over the years -- rather extensive ones in one step can no longer. in any different case -- effective submit :) Peace.

Answer 2

The australopithecines had nothing to do with human origins, they are simply extinct primates. There is already evidence which shows that humans appeared in the fossil record before the australopithecines and lived as contemporaries with the australopithecines throughout all of australopithecine history. No excuses are needed .. Just the science!

Answer 3

God obviously created evolution too. Who would waste their time creating so many creatures when they can do it themselves anyway? All he has to do is guide evolution the right way and then when he made humans he gave them a soul.

You really cannot deny evolution by natural selection as it is a pretty much common sense theory but then again we know that God is omnipotent, so what stops him from creating evolution by natural selection? I mean the ones who can't survive obviously die. Therefore, you must praise God for all the intricate systems he in his omniscience and omnipotence has created to perfect his creatures.

This whole "debate" just stems from a lack of understanding on both parties. "Evolutionists" for not understanding that God could easily create and envision evolution and "Creationists" for not understanding what natural selection is(It doesn't mean animals just change for no reason).

Answer 4

God created and planted fossils to fool people like you. One of his plans to keep from having over population in heaven.

Answer 5

As a former Baptist theologian, I believe that the current thought is the earth was created with history.

When asked, many theologians will say both Adam and Eve had belly buttons, something not needed unless there was a birth. Since they believe that neither Adam nor Eve were born, but created, the belly button shows that a history was created for them at the time of their formation.

The earth, in this vein of thought, is only 7,000 years old but may show the history of things that "could" have happened in a longer history.

Answer 6

I am a Christian and I think they lived. Nowhere are we told the length of time Adam and Eve were in the Garden. Nowhere are we told how Cain went to another country and found a wife. Nowhere are we told how many children Adam and Eve had while in the Garden. We do know, when they were put out of the garden, Eve was to have INCREASED PAIN in childbearing. How do you increase 0?

Answer 7

Also consider, that if we are decended from Adam and Eve, their children would have had to have had sex with each other, and their kids kids, and so on. Not only against what the Bible tells us to do, but think of the inbreeding. Then, if Noah and the ark is true, the same thing would have had to be repeated again......

Answer 8

An aborigine dude from Australia? Yea, I got nothing. Not a science person, you know? However, this fossil could explain Angus and Malcolm Young of AC/DC fame. Have you ever noticed the protruding foreheads on those two? A direct link, maybe?

Answer 9

Humans could have existed alongside of those animals and had methods of survival suitable for the conditions, and perhaps had a method similar to cremation to dispose of the dead bodies due to the high risk of a gravesite being disturbed... just a theory..

Answer 10

They don't think "Lucy" and others like her were in any way human, or early human. They think Lucy was an extinct ape. Which she is, because humans are apes, but they don't think that either.