Unfortunately, countries can only help with what they know. Most Arab countries don't have much in the way of an economy or developed infrastructure. For most, they glut themselves on oil money and leave their citizens in poverty. How can they then help the Palestinians develop in these two fields?
Also, history has shown us that the Arab countries care very little for the Palestinians - only so much as they are political pawns. In 1949 when Gaza was in Egypt's hands, they refused to grant citizenship to the Arabs there, while at the same time refusing to turn Gaza into an independent state. The reason: to keep a captive poverty stricken victim to show the world, while simultaneously fanning the flames of their hate for Israel. Jordan on the other hand did strive to help the Arabs left under its control in the West Bank by annexing the area (though unrecognized internationally) and granting them citizenship. However, this welcome was short-lived as the events creating Black September show us. All other countries accepted refugees and left them as such - poverty stricken refugees forced to live in camps with no citizenship granted. To contrast, Israel, which at the time was a tiny recently founded country, absorbed an equal number of Jewish refugees exiled from Arab countries and (over time) integrated them into Israeli society. It's very much an every-man-for-himself mentality.
2007-09-19 10:09:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael J 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
the fact is, the King of Jordan would desire to rule the palestinians. he's palestinian. His u . s . a . is palestinian. The PLO are thugs, that have been invited in, and booted out of each Arab u . s . a .. you're perfect approximately people getting used as pawns. and in spite of if Israel replaced into called up into the sky, muslims might nonetheless conflict over the country. those truths are self-obtrusive.
2016-10-09 11:27:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean like Egyptians providing aid to Gaza
Or Saudi Arabia paying for medical supplies in the West Bank instead of the UN and Israel.
Or maybe allowing Palestinian refugees who have lived in countries like Syria for generations the right to gain citizenship and economic equality.
You actually expect other Arabs to treat the Palestinians like brothers in need instead of political pawns for manipulation.
What a novel concept... though it might require a degree of compassion and humanity.
2007-09-19 09:22:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Ha ha ha, Arabs help the US ,the Palestinains.
- Lebanese people don't allow us to have 80 jobs, they don't allow the palestinians to own anything or renovate their homes in camps.
- Iraqis are killing the Palestinains for no reason. They calim that we are Wahhabi (Kuffar) and that we helped Saddam Hussain to kill the Shiites.
- In Emarates when a palestinain male becomes 18 they kick him out of the country even if his parents and all his family is there. This is a new law.
-The Egypians occupied parts of the Palestian terretories.
-The Jordanians occupied parts of the Palestinain territories.
Let them go cook, better for them. I like the Israelis even more at least they have a reason for hurting us not like them Arabs who we belong to and whom treating us just like animals.
GIVE Michael J the best answer.
Salaam
2007-09-19 13:26:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mimi 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
Why should they .The Arabs are not interested. They are so rich it's not in their blood to give money away without getting something in return, and why should they give it away to those who dont even attempt to help themselves. THe Palistinians are now killing each other and drowning in their own fanatical Islamic deam of the destruction of Israel.
2007-09-20 05:58:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Key Question: Isn't it funny how Muslims refer to each other as "my brother muslim"?
During 1970's War of Attrition, palesimian militants preferred voluntarily surrendering themselves to the "Zionist entity" rather than being captured by Jordan. The cowardly "freedom fighters" preferred rotting in Israeli jail, where they knew there was no death penalty, then being captured by Jordanian troops. Had they been captured by Jordan, they would not even have gone to jail, but would have been shot on the spot like dogs.
After the Six-Day war, palesimians attempted to cross into Jordan and Egypt (Syria was largely ignored at this point) They were shot as they crossed the borders, by their "brothers". Figures run up to 3,000-4,000 fatalities over a period of 4 or 5 years.
Same thing happened after the Yom Kippur war, trying to take advantage of Syria and Egypt's once-again defeat, the palesimians again tried to infiltrate into Egypt, and this time, Syria. The greatest massacre of palesimians at this point was in Syria, again, at the hands of the "muslim brothers". Syria tested chemical weapons on palesimian refugee camps, and even in villages of Syrian citizens. In all at least 15,000 fatalities, at least 2,000-3,000 were palesmians.
So, we have at least 7,000 fatalities of palesimians caused by fellow muslims. Well, who is worse? The big satan or zionist demon or whatever they say, or the "muslim brothers" themselves?
2007-09-19 10:45:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Uzi Commando 2
·
4⤊
5⤋
All financial aid should be blocked !!! All of it seems to buy armament !!!
2007-09-20 07:48:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by rapturefuture 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
when the Israeli army withdraws from what is rightfully not theirs
2007-09-19 07:50:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
6⤋
since Arab govermants are so scared of US , i dont know when !!
But First Israel Must stop destroying THEIR country
2007-09-19 09:56:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
10⤋