services that the employees rendered for company B but doesn't pay payroll taxes. They argue that since the employees are not employees of company A, they don't need to pay payroll taxes. Since the fringe benefit amounts are less than required for a 1099, they don't issue 1099s. However, no services were rendered by company B's employees to Company A. In fact, company B paid for company A's employees. These are obviously related organizations. Is this really an ingenious way of avoiding payroll taxes? It doesn't sound right to me to set up two companies and one pays the other's employees without receiving any services or goods in return and avoids payroll taxes.
2007-09-19
05:45:46
·
1 answers
·
asked by
not 30 yet
2
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States