i once heard a story about the lost years of Jesus that are not included in the bible. he traveled to the East (India, and other parts of Asia) he met Mary Magdalene along the way and supposedly he eventually married her and they had kids. but the bible portrays her a harlot because they wanted to show followers that even people who commit really bad sins can be forgiven. (that makes a lot of sense to me) but i don't know about the marriage thing. I feel like why should it matter if Jesus was married or had kids would that make him any less of a savior?
2007-09-19 04:07:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by complicated 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
The Holy Spirit we talk to told us that there was no sexual relationship between Mary Magdalene and Jesus whatsoever. Since she was a very beautiful woman, she tried to attract Jesus but Jesus told her what His mission is this world was which she eventually believed. The Holy Spirit also told us that Jesus said to her something that she became depressed and did not come out of her house for several days. When she emerged, she followed Jesus and realized the sins that she had committed.
According to the Holy Spirit, she was not a prostitute but something more like a nymphomaniac because she was very beautiful and could easily attract men.
She became an ardent disciple of Jesus, and that was just their relationship. When Jesus resurrected and called her name, she was startled when she realized it was Jesus. She said “Rabboni” (John 20:16) and not words likely used by a lover or a spouse.
Also, when Jesus was crucified, she was watching from afar. Isn’t it that usually, the close relatives are closer to the dying while the others are just spectators? Another thing, Jesus entrusted His mother to His beloved disciple (a male person) (John 19:27 – the disciple took her into his own home). If Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married, Jesus could have entrusted His mother to her.
2007-09-19 04:34:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Peace Crusader 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Okay first of all - the Bible does NOT portray Mary Magdalene as a prostitute or otherwise. These are all different women who were combined in a speech by Gregory the Great in 591.
Now....most scholars (as in professors who have made it thier lifes work to study this stuff) don't believe that Mary Magdalane was ever married to Jesus or his lover or the mother of his children, or anything else. The gnostic Christian text "Gospel of Mary Magdalene" shows her as an apostle on par with the men in the group, who understands the teachings of Jesus better than the others -causing Peter to get pissed and throw a little tantrum at the end of the text.
The whole kissing thing that Dan Brown mentions in his book and bases his whole story on is a word that is missing in one of the texts that was found in the Nag Hammadi Library.. and he filled it in with "kissed." So, even if the word should be kiss, there was a belief back then about the ability to essentially pass knowledge by way of a kiss -nothing sexual in it at all.
2007-09-19 04:21:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by SisterSue 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
no longer something interior the recent testomony advise any specific or sexual relationship between the two. Mary is pronounced three times in scripture. In Luke 5 she is pronounced, alongside with Joanna the spouse of Chuza, as between the main important economic individuals to Jesus' ministry. we are advised there that Jesus had solid seven demons out of her. remember that different that the time while devil himself tempted Jesus, demons interior the gospels are no longer linked with inflicting sin, yet with illnesses and psychological ailments. She is pronounced back over the previous week of Jesus' existence, while she comes an anoints his ft with an costly physique spray. Anointing someone's ft replaced into an act of undemanding courtesy in those days. the only reason that's pronounced is that Judas objected to using the physique spray, asserting that it would bought and the money given to the undesirable basically because of the fact he replaced into stealing from the team's handbag. ultimately, Mary is taken into consideration one of various women who visit the tomb of Jesus to end the burial ritual that replaced into interrupted by employing the arriving of the Sabbath following his removal from the go. She is the only one so stay on the tomb, and so is the 1st to work out the resurrected Jesus. previous that, there is not any point out of any specific relationship between the two. Jesus himself replied the question approximately in spite of if or no longer they have been enthusiasts or married in Matthew 19. There he pronounced those, like himself, who're called to be eunuch of the dominion of God. meaning that they've chosen to no longer have sexual relationships of marriage so as that they are in a position to commit themselves finished time to the provider of God. Jesus replaced into stating that he replaced into celibate - he did no longer work together in any sexual relationships. additionally in case you examine for the time of the Bible, you will locate that being left a widow (or if the two had a newborn - an orphan) replaced into between the main tragic issues that ought to take place. understanding that he might die youthful and then return to heaven, taking a spouse (or lover) and leaving a newborn replaced into have been risky and tragic for them, He does no longer have that to Mary or all and sundry else.
2016-10-09 11:16:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who knows anything about Christian theology knows that not only is this idea is not backed up in the bible, it also would make no sense theologically. On the other hand, suggesting this has proven a good way to sell books and make movies.
2007-09-19 04:06:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Thom 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
The whole body of Christ are Jesus lovers.
2007-09-19 04:04:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by t_a_m_i_l 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
There is absolutly no proof in that in scripture or in early Christian writers. It is a tool by which folk like Dan Brown and others can make money.
2007-09-19 04:04:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by s. grant 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
There is no indication *either* way in "accepted" scripture. Other non-canonized books would seem to indicate that there was something between them, like marriage.
The stout denials of believers show how little they understand about their religion as they assume that this would make christ less than what they believe him to be.
2007-09-19 04:08:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, Jesus didn't have a lover, His love was for His chruch. †
2007-09-19 04:06:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
There's no reason to think that she was. It would have been mentioned by those who knew him, traveled with him and wrote about him.
2007-09-19 04:05:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋