It sounds crude to say "Bush" but he works in a vacuum he is the decision maker -his decision to attack Iraq has been a mistake-and has left the next President a huge debt and a much more dangerous world-will Bush make a drastic move to try to save his legacy?????
2007-09-19 01:08:47 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It's just a matter of time,yes. The question for me is how he would do it without declaring war on Iran,in which case he would need approval from Congress
2007-09-19 01:14:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your Iranian neighbor is right here as a results of government of Iran. I easily have had Iranian acquaintances too and that they before everything say they're Persians because of the fact Iran's government is a source of shock and embarrassment. Iran is the only which will dictate that is very own destiny by cooperating or terminating the Nuclear software no person incredibly believes has been suspended. Israel is extra probably to strike than us and have offered needed weapons. the u . s . would be dragged right into a conflict if Iran makes stable on that is threats and could be merely hit many times. actuality learn this could not be an Iraq difficulty or Afghanistan the place we take over. it's going to be an air and a few sea conflict with constrained engagements alongside the Iraq border. Iran will straight away lose that is scuffling with skill and could sue for peace as against humiliating defeat.
2016-10-19 02:14:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Chances are he will go upstairs to his quarters on the second floor of the White House, when he leaves his office.
After your question, nothing you say is correct. Mr. Bush does not work in a vacuum. If he did, he would die from lack of oxygen.
The President has to make lots of tough decisions. That is why we elected him and that is what he gets paid to do.
The decision by the coalition to enter Iraq was the right decision. The coalition forces are still in Iraq. France's new president is considering sending aid.
Deficit spending is the fault of Congress. They spend more money than that which is brought in. The President cannot spend anything without the approval of Congress. The US has had a growing national debt since the days of the depression..
We live in a much safer world since the coalition took over in Iraq and in Afghanistan. World-wide terror attacks are almost non existent and would-be terrorists are getting rounded up all of the time.
Mr. Bush is not Bill Clinton. Mr. Bush cares about doing what is right...not a legacy. Pay attention to what he says and does.
Please cancel your membership in the "world-wide doom and gloom society."
2007-09-19 01:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I think Keypointist has a very good point. I don't think he has the time or the resources to go into Iran right now. I don't think the plan will be off the table with the next president though. We have to get Iraq stabilized first or reinstate the draft before we can have anymore war than what we have now. With that said if Iran makes a wrong move we also have them surrounded and it wouldn't be a hard thing to invade them but we will also have consequences to face. China or Russia may want to step in.
2007-09-19 01:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is up to Iran and no he doesn't make decisions in vacuum just because you don't like his choices.
More dangerous let see how many terrorists attacks have we had since 9/11 here?
We put Muslim terrorists on the defense.
Guess what the more and more Muslims are begining to wake up to the idea that terrorism is not the way to go.
As far as Iran goes read this and see what you think about the peaceful Iranians.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411428847&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
2007-09-19 01:43:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think so I mean why not, he has gotten us involved with every other country whether it be wars, or relief efforts, or medical aid all while neglecting the US people.
First off I don't vote I am neither a Democrat or Republican so don't think I am bashing because of political affiliation. I don't vote for the reason that politicians are liars and frauds and it does not make a difference. All both parties are concerned about is bashing eachother and truing to get their members into office. Worrying about impeaching, scandals, investigations, and who is trying to get sex in a restroom. All while gas prices are rising more and more, people cant afford health care, property taxes are increasing, and foreclosures are turning the markets upside down.
Anymore we are too concerned about making nicey nice with foreign countries to build wealth for the rich and make allies to try and outlaw another country from being able to govern its own.
2007-09-19 01:12:56 · answer #6 · answered by Jason 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i hope so. I think it will go like this we stay in Iraq next pres comes into office Iraq starts ruining their own country (depending who is office)we will leave or forced to. Iran will invade we will come back and will start over
2007-09-19 01:32:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Better yet...Will France attack and surrender to Iran in the same day?
2007-09-19 01:30:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not sure, looks like France may want their oil first.
Its seems just right that it would be France with their newly elected psycho President. Britain used to own Iran's oil, then the US, then Iran for 28 years and now I would think give France a go at stealing it.
2007-09-19 01:14:45 · answer #9 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Bush is gonna outfox Hillary and RAM Universal Health Care down the throat of every American.
The Patriot Act wasn't enough.
The dud's competing with Hitler, Mao and Stalin.
The implanted microchips will be his Legacy.
.
2007-09-19 01:12:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋