just blinder
2007-09-19 00:10:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nemesis 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
actual technology is approximately gaining wisdom of how our universe works. The classic definition of the medical approach comprises a million.) asking a question, 2.) offering a hypothesis (each each now and then elective), 3.) placing approximately to coach OR DISPROVE reported hypothesis. whilst that is finished, the outcomes may well be commented on, yet incredibly could communicate for themselves in the context of the test. technology isn't approximately indoctrination, editorializing outcomes to comply with a particular concept gadget, or extrapolating the outcomes to improve a philosophical time table. whilst that is finished, that's what the Bible calls "technology falsely referred to as so." (a million Timothy 6:20-21). human beings ought to undergo in strategies besides that many occurrences defined interior the Bible are, by definition, no longer repeatable under laboratory situations. No, medical test is going to coach that a super type of those issues do no longer take place universal. for this reason they're miracles to be believed by faith.
2016-10-19 02:10:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My faith in God grows stronger every day.
Since God created ALL things, He created science and those who study it.
By the way, science has proven the Bible to be correct.
2007-09-19 00:24:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by D.A. S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's about even... you're going to have ones whose faith gets weaker and then you have those that see something to fight against and their faith and resolve get stronger. It is relative to perception... the majority who believes in God will use any result in order to back up that belief. Their parents did it and their parents parents, etc etc.... It's natural to do so when you are brought up that way to begin with. And the majority are...
2007-09-19 00:21:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by River 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My faith becomes stronger, Because the more science tries to disprove God the more they prove him, I am not ignorant of what science is doing, I watch many of these discovery channels, & Science channels, & when Science think they have an answer, their final statement is We don't know.
2007-09-19 00:17:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
So, you are admitting that Science is a form of religion to you?
I thought that science and religion were two different and separate things. Supposedly that is why Creationism and Intelligent Design theory are considered to be bad science; both try to use science to prove the claims of religion, and science has nothing to do with the supernatural.
Most of the great scientists of all time were religious people. I don't see too many atheists on that list.
2007-09-19 00:14:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ned F 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that if we look honestly at science, belief is not threatened.
Science is not concerned with purpose and cannot possibly find purpose in nature. No matter how much science we learn, science will never give us a purpose for living.
“Unless you assume a God, the question of life’s purpose is meaningless.” –Bertrand Russell
So after everything, we still constantly ask over and over and over again, "what is my purpose in life" and "what is the meaning of life".
2007-09-19 00:23:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Matthew T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Speaking for myself, my faith only grows stronger as science provides more and more insight into the marvels of creation. But what REALLY clinches it for me is string theory. If true, then I rather think the unbelievers are in for a shock!
2007-09-19 00:15:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Granny Annie 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Stronger.
2007-09-19 00:23:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is absurd to think that over time a theory about how some scientist thinks the world started would become more true.
They claim absurd things to be proof.
2007-09-19 00:34:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by rose_ovda_night 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
stronger, FYI often at the end science contibute a strong fundamental base for God's believer
2007-09-19 00:13:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by RioM 3
·
3⤊
0⤋