macro-evolution is not. You say that macro-evolution is just the result of micro-evolution over the course of millions of years, but how could that be when the Earth is only 6,000 years old? Isn't there a little problem with your timeline?
2007-09-18 19:24:30 · 15 answers · asked by Pull My Finger 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Actually, in requiring that terrestrial biodiversity derive from the volume of the ark in 4,500 years, Creationists require a much higher rate.
2007-09-18 19:31:58 · answer #1 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's the God-did-it hypothesis. we gained't extremely instruct something because of the fact God could have made it that way. subsequently no information can ever be seen real because of the fact God controls all the info. ALL information is situation to His supernatural manipulations and no technological information could be a hundred% helpful of something. even however, in case you compromise for this approach you're able to be helpful of one factor - in case you somewhat have self belief particularly historical scriptures (even however they have of course been revised via many palms over the centuries), and carry on with all of their admonitions (and subsequently exchange into “good”) you’ll on no account die yet be rewarded to your goodness via residing continually in paradise, and (right here’s the “good” area) all the “undesirable” adult males will go through for eternity because of the fact’s what those creeps deserve. introduction belongs to the supernatural. yet ALL technological information (no longer in basic terms evolution) denies the supernatural. Why? because of the fact there has on no account been a surely referred to, scientifically repeated, or objectively pronounced supernatural experience - ever. till there is, any reasonable, rational man or woman ought to shun such ideals. yet we don't. Why? because of the fact we are the made of organic and organic and cultural evolution, which consists of the emergence of non secular and magico-non secular ideals. we are neither reasonable nor rational organisms and no technological information or faith will ever save us from destroying ourselves. there is not any Biblical technological information merely magical thinking and unquestioning perception. Magical thinking/faith is a fashion of believing approximately issues that we predict of are immutable; technological information is a fashion of asking questions approximately issues we don’t understand. have self belief what you like, yet understand that there are no rational motives to incorporate any magical perception device and in case you somewhat commence pondering epistemology, you’ll in all probability finally end up being an atheist – be careful!
2016-11-05 21:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I realize that you are just trying to be funny, but honestly now, your questions are starting to be annoying.
2007-09-18 19:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by Harry 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah yeah, and the earth is flat right?
thanks for the laugh.
2007-09-18 22:07:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is your problem....If people are so against creation then there must be something to it. If they want to dedicated their life to disproving we were created by God then let them miss out on what the great all knowing father has for them.
2007-09-18 19:36:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Ah .... that is provided earth is only 6000 years old.
2007-09-18 19:36:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not really if you stay with the idea of a universe.
2007-09-18 19:33:04 · answer #7 · answered by brkshandilya 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A lot of things can evolve in 6000 years. I bet in another 6000 men will grow a 2nd scrotum.
2007-09-18 19:34:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Ted Haggert - keep away from young boys!
2007-09-18 19:33:06 · answer #9 · answered by nicelyevolve 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Maybe there is a little problem with the bible.
2007-09-18 19:30:21 · answer #10 · answered by ML 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋