There are a lot of natural things that don't end up with having children. If we follow your logic, a post-menopausal woman cannot have sex because she can no longer get pregnant. A pregnant woman can't have sex. A man with a low sperm count can't have sex, because it probably won't end up in a conception. Come on. Homosexuality occurs in nature; therefore, it is by definition natural.
And, Julia, your statistics are a bit off. I believe it's closer to 10% of the population are homosexual.
2007-09-18 14:10:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
6⤋
It appears somewhat biased and peculiar that the only issue people who use the "unnatural, due to inability to reproduce" theory is homosexuality.
The internet they use to post their redundant blather is not natural. Seems that's ok. Even if used to protray hurtful, hateful, and prideful messages to all humankind.
The cell phones they never stop gossipping over is anything but natural, however... well, you see the point.
Since when do we decide what is right and wrong simply in the criteria of what is natural?
Think of our lives and ask how much of it is "natural?"
Don't you see? The only thing that sets us apart from the animal kingdom is our ability to step outside of natural and adapt. When looking at the wonders of our modern world and the LEAPS in technology just in my lifetime... is it really so hard to believe that homosexuality CAN'T be a type of adaptation?
If God's ways are not like our ways... and our human minds can't comprehend his everlasting wisdom and knowledge... is it possible at all that it's just the way some people are?
The keyword is people.
Your opinion of the nature of homosexuality is irrelevent. Only the most uptight and evil-minded care at all what people like that do.... good or bad.
A Mule is natural... it can't reproduce.
Hello?
If you aint gay... its none of your business.
Stop thinking about what I do with my private parts. Your wicked imagination is perv-squirming into your regular life.
Quit hollerin about my splinter and spend some time chipping that log thats sticking out of your face.
2007-09-18 14:35:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dustin Lochart 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do they need to? Don't you get it? Homosexuality is one of natures birth control methods. There are 6.5 BILLION people on this planet and you really think there needs to be even more?
There are more and more homosexuals and probably for good reason. Its a recessive gene, obviously.
Yes, its natural. And we don't need any more damned babies. Especially when most people still can't keep their legs closed or control their base despicable urges.
Who in hell are you to deny two people their love just because you don't happen to like what they do together physically?
Grow up and stop the prejudiced hatred.
2007-09-18 14:19:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Right. It occurs in nature, therefore it's natural. But cancer appears in nature too, so why don't we all just embrace cancer? Just because something occurs in nature doesn't make it a good thing. I don't dislike gay people, and I do believe they were born that way and can't control it, but I wish people would stop acting like it's normal, because it isn't normal. If we were all gay, the species would have died out a long time ago.
2007-09-18 14:15:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The definition of "natural" has nothing to do with being homosexual.
2007-09-18 14:17:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Char 1 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Think about it...........God created a man and a woman with different body makeups. a woman has a uterus to carry a child; a man does not. The man has the "seed" or sperm needed to impregnate the female.
Neither can 2 men or 2 women carry out this mission, being that they are ill-equipped to do so. Homosexuality is not natural; it is a choice that some make.
2007-09-18 14:16:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by sugarbee 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Did ya ever think that maybe homosexuality is Nature's method of population control?
2007-09-18 14:15:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rin 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
That is the ultimate argument closer. Research shows that most homosexuals have mental issues and by engaging in homosexual activities helps numb the real issue. Just like drug users. Probably why most gays do drugs also
2007-09-18 14:20:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
If it's completely unnatural for people who can't have children together to be together, why are there sterile couples?
Not everything that is natural results in reproduction. Not everything that results in reproduction is natural.
Your argument is based on false logic.
There are, even in the animal world, homosexual couples. It is not something unique to huumans.
2007-09-18 14:14:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Deirdre H 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
Your attempt at logic has failed. Homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality is... deal with it, move on, get a life!
2007-09-18 14:26:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋