"Non-sparking", "spark-resistant" or "spark-proof" tools are names given to tools made of metals such as brass, bronze, Monel metal (copper-nickel alloy), copper-aluminum alloys (aluminum bronze), copper-beryllium alloys (beryllium bronze), and titanium. Preferred "non-sparking" metals have less tensile strength than steels usually used to make tools. A lower tensile strength means the metal has less strength or resistance to tearing apart when stretched under test conditions. It also means that these tools are softer, wear down more quickly than ordinary steel tools, and have to be dressed more frequently.
Tools made from stainless steel also have a lower tendency to generate sparks than those made from steel commonly used for making tools (tool steels). The name "non-sparking" is misleading because these tools are capable of producing a spark: the term "reduced-sparking tools" better describes these tools.
All metal tools can produce sparks. While "non-sparking" tools may lower the risk of a spark, they do not eliminate the possibility of sparks. Non-metals like wood, leather, and plastic are suitable for some tools like shovels, scrapers or scoops and do not pose a friction spark hazard.
Non-sparking tools cannot be relied upon when working in potentially flammable atmospheres in the same way one relies on certified explosion-proof motors or electrical equipment. For example, the NFPA (National Fire Protection Association in the US) has reported that the is little or no advantage of using non-sparking tools instead of stainless steel tools in preventing explosions of hydrocarbon-air mixtures.
Both "sparking" and "non-sparking" materials can cause ignition. Two types of hazards are associated with tools manufactured of either material:
Ignition by friction, with impact on each other or on other materials such as steel or concrete, in which an "ordinary" (mechanical or frictional) spark is generated. All tools can ignite flammable mixtures by sparks generated by friction or impact. However, this is true only when the generated spark is incendive: that means a spark that has to have enough heat content (i.e., enough mass and sufficiently high temperature) and has to last long enough to heat a flammable air-vapour mixture above its ignition temperature. This is more likely in the case of sparks formed when using a metal grinder that a spark generated when a hammer strikes some metal.
Ignition by a chemically-generated spark, caused by impact between certain metals and some oxygen-containing substances (such as rust, which is iron oxide).
Non-sparking tools which contact oxygen-bearing materials, such as rust, can produce a spark which burns hotter and lasts longer than a "ordinary" spark.
Steel tools, if handled carefully, are no more dangerous in hazardous environments than "non-sparking" ones.
Non-sparking tools are not certified for work in hazardous environments. Electric motors, on the other hand, can be certified as "explosion-proof" for use in hazardous work locations. This certification gives almost 100% assurance that use of this equipment will not ignite explosive atmosphere. In a hazardous environment these assurances can not be given with the use of non-sparking tools.
Taken From: http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/safety_haz/hand_tools/nonsparking.html
2007-09-18 14:38:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by gatorbait 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This Site Might Help You.
RE:
I made a ball mill, but i need metals that wont spark, will coins spark? if so, which will and which wont?
I am messing with VERY VERY flammable chemicals so i need, like i said, spark less coins, i think ive heard that quarters don't spark?
2015-08-18 23:18:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Willi 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ahaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaahahhhhhh got my laugh machine into overdrivel
2016-03-16 13:49:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋