Why have the fossils of modern animals never been found intermingled with those of dinosaurs? Why are ONLY animals which supposedly died out after the flood found on the lower layers?
2007-09-18 09:38:40 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The question is classified in one of the kinds of religion & spirituality. According to old Indian books of Religion & spirituality,after a very long period of our universe,the water would be there and whole universe would be seen as sea. Accordingly,there can be possibility that after the flood as stated animals fossils which have much weight than persons died out after the flood found on the lower layers.
2007-09-19 03:22:48 · answer #1 · answered by misraop2004 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This creationist says the fossils came from dinosaurs and other animals who lived millions of years ago and these fossils did not come from the flood.
2007-09-18 09:45:19 · answer #2 · answered by Someone who cares 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And if mankind lived with the dinosaurs, why doesn't the Bible mention that. I understand some claim various monsters mentioned elsewhere are dinosaurs, but I would think, due to their size, dinosaurs would have caused serious problems to civilization. Think about it, a four-story tall brachiosaurus walking through Jerusalem would do a lot of damage (and wouldn't this come up from time to time in the Bible?). And if they were wiped out by the flood, why are they only mentioned AFTER the flood in the Bible?
2007-09-18 09:51:32 · answer #3 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
between others, Richard Dawkins has talked approximately multiple circumstances that evolution by using organic decision ought to easily be "falsified" (opposite to the claims of YECers that it can not) if we got here upon, for example, a fossil of a fashionable rabbit in Cambrian layers. you will possibly anticipate one in all those element from a unexpected catastrophic flood which blended up each and all of the residing animals some thousand years in the past...yet no such element has ever been got here upon. Oops. Peace.
2016-10-09 10:17:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do we know that there aren't? All we can figure out is that the bones are from something that was living. There are plenty of bones to be had, the only trouble is trying to put them together. When they do find the skeletel remains intact, it is like gold, it is a very rare thing. How do they know what color they were? Of how they sounded, of if they were hot or cold blooded? There seems to be a lot taken for granted from the remains of whatever it is that they found.
2007-09-18 09:50:36 · answer #5 · answered by michael m 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i saw one of those pictures of a human footprint and a dinosaur one. I guess i'm the only one who thought it funny that humans back then wore shoes with a reebok logo on them.
but back to reality, most of those 'human' footprints had three toes. how funny is that?
2007-09-18 09:47:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I saw a report, on TV recently, showing Dinosaurs and human prints in the same fossil. So they have been found together.
What is a Creationists?
2007-09-18 09:46:53 · answer #7 · answered by geessewereabove 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
What animals have died out after the flood? except the dodo?
2007-09-18 09:51:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Scientists separated them. (only joking)
Look at some of the stupid answers you get here though. Christians will make up anything if strengthen their arguments. They have done this throughout the history of their church
2007-09-18 09:47:29 · answer #9 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Bible doesn,t mention a lot of the animal,s but they are still here and was.
2007-09-18 09:59:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋