Why marriage?

Question

Why do women want to get married? You have to change your identity (last name taken away), in some religions' vows you are to serve and submit to your husband, and women are EXCITED to do this!?!? But, from birth they are raised to dream of a beautiful wedding, they are given dolls to play with, and most of the time are never pushed to think for themselves.... I think marriage (in a lot of religions) is an institution to control women. I mean someone has to cook clean and ask no questions, right? i don't think so.... women: think about what you let yourselves fall into.
Now I do acknowledge that there ARE some beliefs that have a different meaning and hold different views about marriage. But I have been to a lot of weddings and I can remember being totally appalled by some of the vows, I think they were Methodists (I could be wrong). I'm not trying to offend any religion or anyone; I just wonder...... why?

Answer 1

For women marriage is bad business...

Even with equality of rights... when men marry they get home aid for free, when women marry all they get is double journey!

Answer 2

See, the situation with the "Well, a brother and sister dwelling co-dependently might benefit from the identical advantages" means that no 2 immediately men and women have *ever* abused the wedding procedure once they were not in a romantic courting. But a sibling couple doing so could nonetheless be legally "married"; they could no longer then, in flip, be allowed to marry any one they had been truthfully romantically curious about with out dissolving that partnership, with all of the authorized disorders a divorce can intent. I imply, I consider if a brother/sister pair (or brother/brother or sister/sister, had been homosexual marriage authorized) desired to go into right into a lifelong, non-romantic authorized partnership, definite, they might conceivably call for they be granted marriage rights. But such partnerships could be as an alternative few and a ways among, as I believe the social stigma of stressful you be allowed to marry your sister could more often than not suppress that organization. A extra pertinent query could be on the way to manage the quantity of contributors in a wedding. If marriage is spread out from wherein it's now, then there may be the query approximately whether or not polyamorous unions must be legally identified. And if we then extended marriage to enable, say, four contributors, then what approximately polygamists who suppose socially ostracized for the reason that they've a five-method courting? Polygamists and brothers in need of to marry their sisters, nevertheless, represent a tiny, tiny fraction of American society. Homosexuals, at the same time nonetheless a minority, quantity a ways better. Opening up marriage to identical-intercourse couples, I consider, is a solution to furnish those romantic pairings the identical authorized rights which are presently loved by way of an identical partnerships, at the same time minimizing the difference to the total procedure. Sure, the "slippery slope" argument can nonetheless be carried out, however simply for the reason that beginning up marriage to homosexuals could open up a better can of worms does not imply it is not a well and correct factor to do.

Answer 3

The family is the basic construct of any successful society. Women innately know this and seek it out.