Sin is a concept developed by religious leaders to control the masses. So, no.
Personally I don't do either.
2007-09-18 03:44:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Murazor 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not for actual consumption, or self-defense or vermin control, but shooting animals for sport is WRONG. I have no problems with people shooting white-tailed deer (after all, there are too many of them and venison is rather good), but shooting a bobcat or going to Africa to kill a lion just for the trophy is totally wrong.
2007-09-18 23:45:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a sin to hurt animals for no apparent reason.
2007-09-18 10:51:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♆Şрhĩņxy - Lost In Time. 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
to a Satanist there is no sin. But as a Satanist, an animal should NEVER be harmed except in self defense of for one's food.
2007-09-18 10:43:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't believe in "sin" but I do think that it is unethical to hurt any living thing for no reason. We humans are naturally omnivores, so we do need to eat meat in my opinion...so killing an animal (as quickly and painlessly as possible) is ethically acceptable if it is for food. Killing it because it is "fun" isn't ok.
2007-09-18 10:42:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by N 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would consider it so... unless it's a dangerous animal like a spider, snake, bee, or something deseased to the point of makeing a human sick.
2007-09-18 15:25:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Goddess Enzeru 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah
There's a big difference between some flaming a**hole of a coward such as Micheal Vick killing a dog for fun and somebody killing a cow for beef.
2007-09-18 11:10:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Let me guess...you're a fan of Michael Vick.
Pathetic.
2007-09-18 11:13:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by kaz716 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
hurting animals is not a "sport"
2007-09-18 10:41:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2007-09-18 10:59:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by irisheyes 6
·
1⤊
0⤋