In the 90's a wrench was thrown into the Presidential Elections by Ross Perot, and in the ots, by Ralph Nader. Were there instant run-off elections in these cases, we could have been assured in who the President should have been. There is nothing that I can find unconsitutional about instant run-off elections in this our non-parlimentary democratic republic, so why don't we have them?
2007-09-18
02:15:51
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Civic Participation
Wow, I hadn't even heard there was a movement toward this in America. I had just heard of it used in other 1st world countries.
2007-09-18
03:07:40 ·
update #1