I'm going with alchemy because it was the foundation of the modern science of chemistry that we know today while creationism is just a bunch of bullcrap that stagnates real science.
2007-09-17 14:05:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5pENUuCEBA&mode=related&search=
Creationism is bullshit, any real scientist can tell you that. You just choose to ignore anything that disproves your bullshit Bible.
2007-09-17 14:15:16 · update #1
Creationism
Alchemy didn't have all the good science to fall back on.
2007-09-17 14:08:22 · answer #1 · answered by atheist 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
First, creationism is not a science. It was an event. Second, alchemy was not a "pseudoscience". It was the precursor of modern chemistry. Alchemists came up with the idea of alloys. They produced bronze, steel and other metals we have used ever since. They were sword-makers and developers of medicine.
Read about alchemy. It will amaze you.
Also, neither evolution or creation is proven or provable. They aren't mutually exclusive either. Could an evolving world have been created? Maybe so.
2007-09-17 14:18:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Creationism
2007-09-17 14:09:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They both include magic. Once that was removed from alchemy, it became a specialized Science of matter. But you can't remove magic from creationism, can you. What would it be without it? Abiogenesis? Evolution? Hm..
2016-05-17 09:18:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to your question and response, Creationism would contain more BS. Not alchemy as you stated.
2007-09-17 14:09:58 · answer #5 · answered by punch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, alchemy was the precursor to all our advances in medication. People have been using willow bark for years for pain, they knew that there was a difference between steeping, boiling, creating a tincture, etc... in the strength of the herbs/concoctions...
You get the idea.
2007-09-17 14:09:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Creationism is not a science. It is a position one takes. There are others like evolutionism, which accidentally is not a science either.
Scientific evidence can be examined in the light of either one of the above positions. In my view, although I am not alone on this, scientific evidence points towards creationism.
2007-09-17 14:18:15 · answer #7 · answered by Mutations Killed Darwin Fish 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Exactly. At least alchemy led up to chemistry; and at least the medieval alchemists had the excuse of the general ignorance of mankind at that time.
2007-09-17 14:09:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Creationism is perhaps the least scientific pseudoscience to ever defile the earth with its abhorrent presence. Hell would be a peaceful place were it not for its existence.
2007-09-17 14:10:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A plus to alchemy is that it helped found methods for experimentation that are still used today.
2007-09-17 14:10:09 · answer #10 · answered by anthro-utopia 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Creationism because they have access to more detailed information that they just refuse to accept and ignore.
What a croc of @#%$.
2007-09-17 14:11:12 · answer #11 · answered by goatslunch 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋