2007-09-17 10:02:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No most people can read what he actually wrote and don't need or want poor spellers to try to interpret it for them.
2007-09-17 10:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What I found to be remarkable was a former head of the Federal Reserve who doesn't realize that the President's role in charting the course of the economy is limited. That includes appointing the members of the Federal Reserve. But, Federal law prohibits any other involvment by the Executive Branch. But, given Mister Greenspan's age, perhaps he is being nostalgic for the likes of FDR and wants some sort of "Federal Wizard King" instead of one who might be trying to carry out the job description contained in Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
2007-09-17 18:35:15 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives have been screaming about this Administration's spending for years. You need to watch FOX or read the National Review to see what they are saying, so you can at least look as though you know something.
2007-09-18 13:25:31 · answer #3 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you'd been paying attention, you might have noticed that many conservatives have been upset with the spending habits of both Bush and the previous GOP-led Congress.
But I fail to see what you deem "irresponsibility".
2007-09-17 17:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Doubtful.
I'm just glad he came out and said the real reason why Bush & Co. went into Iraq: oil.
2007-09-17 17:12:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
would be nice but they are a pretty dense group kinda of like cattle they follow the leader into a corner
2007-09-17 17:20:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋