the empty tomb.He was seen by over 500 people at once.Read 1Corinthians 15
2007-09-17 05:31:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
7⤋
Well... zombie movies at least show that it is POSSIBLE... but that's the most reliable evidence that I am aware of.
Look, deluded believers... the gospels... and all the characters in them... INCLUDING Jesus... and all the EVENTS in them... INCLUDING the resurrection... are FICTION. In the christian writings that pre-date 70 AD there is nothing that even HINTS at the existence of a historical Jesus. And there are no contemporaneous documents APART from the bible that make any mention whatsoever of Jesus. The 'witnesses' in the gospels are no more significant that the 'witnesses' in the Superman comics saying "Look... up in the sky... it's a bird... it's a plane... it's SUPERMAN."
.
2007-09-17 05:47:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
None. Look at the gospel accounts of the tomb. They are all different. They conflict. This proves that it was made up. Nobody witnessed it. Nobody who was alive at the time wrote a word about it. It was all written down long afterwards by people who were not even there.
It's even more silly than Jo Smith's golden tablets. Only at least we know Jo Smith did exist, and people who wrote about him actually DID know the man.
2007-09-17 05:44:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Earl Grey 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think I saw it in a George A. Romero film.
I guess if an empty tomb serves as evidence of a resurrection, then an empty cage serves as evidence for an escaped unicorn.
Then again, if one has have faith, no objective historical evidence should be needed in the first place.
And no, this isn't the same as finding evidence for Abe Lincoln. We can find plenty of independent and eye-witness evidence of him and artifacts relating to him. We can even do so for earlier historical figures like Julius Caesar. But figures like Jesus or Pythagoras are another story, because we only have one or two after-the-fact accounts written on them.
2007-09-17 05:32:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
What good would proof do?
There is a significant portion of the population that refuses to believe that the Earth is more than 10,000 years old despite enormous amounts of proof that this planet is 4.5 billion years old.
Show me proof that having proof would make one bit of difference.
.
2007-09-17 05:36:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
because He described Me, His god as A'b'add'on.
b being a DI sealed together with D appearing like IIII
means He must have been alive to see My arm, 2000 years later. or he really could foresee the future.
note italian rebels try to get you to belive God is A'bad'don but thats the 1/3 that rebelled against God the Father with fat part-herr=father.
2007-09-17 05:34:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
None, whatsoever. The first attestation came decades after the alleged incident and reported by third-hand accounts. Not exactly reliable.
2007-09-17 05:35:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Obviously the testimony of the Apostles, who said that they saw him.
If they were lying, then why did they -- in many cases -- allow themselves to be tortured to death rather than recant their story? Wouldn't a liar confess in order to save his own life?
2007-09-17 05:39:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Randy G 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Dear Opinionated,
An empty tomb. And over 500 people saw Jesus alive after His crucifiction.
2007-09-17 05:32:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
No proof
2007-09-17 06:45:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by kabduk 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe there are some written records of Jesus being seen eating villagers brains shortly after his crucifixion.
2007-09-17 05:32:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋