English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

43 answers

Don`t know ,,,but children playing mummies and daddies would go out the door

2007-09-17 04:27:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

As most people have said, gay people are perfectly able to procreate. If they can't stomach actually having sexual intercourse to do so, then artificial insemination is a perfectly reasonable alternative.

Generally, I'm not sure about the point of your question. Are you implying that if everyone was homosexual then mankind would not survive and that homosexuality is therefore wrong in some way?

But you might as well say the same about monks or priests. Or you might ask, if everybody was a doctor, who would run the country? Your question is no more, or less, sensible than that.

As Toogethr implies, all we really learn from this kind of question is that diversity is a good thing.

2007-09-17 04:51:51 · answer #2 · answered by garik 5 · 1 0

This question was addressed by the Ancient Greeks, they were only allowed to be homosexual until their early 20's or so, then they were expected to do their fair share to procreate with the women in the society. If the men continued with their homosexuality beyond a certain age, it was looked down upon by their peers in their society.

Apparently this system, that seemed to solve the problem of furthering the population amisst a culture of homosexuality, didn't work out so well.

2007-09-17 04:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by LadyB!™ 4 · 0 0

If everyone was homosexual then there is a possibility that the number of children born would fall. However with artificial insemination etc etc the next generation would be born. Since we are told it's not hereditary I'm sure the next generation would pick up where we left off.

2007-09-17 04:32:40 · answer #4 · answered by Sean C 2 · 1 0

If every child born was a male, how could mankind survive beyond one generation?


If the sun suddenly turned into chrysanthemum (thanks Yahoo for spell check!) petals, how would mankind survive beyond one generation?

If the Earth was to suddenly turn into a black hole for no very good reason how would everyone survive the next ten seconds (going by the time on the surface of Mars, before all you physicists point out the time dilation effects)


If you ran out of stupid hypothetical questions, would your brain implode within the next generation?

2007-09-17 04:29:20 · answer #5 · answered by Simon T 7 · 6 0

Hi....

There is actually a chance that 'without' homosexuality, you might not even be here now!!

Average homosexual percentage in humanity is:
1 in 10 of the population.

6.5 BILLION ...Worldwide human population now.

If homosexuality had NEVER existed, ALL homosexuals breeding too, making babies.....

What would the World population be today?

Have you seen how places, like China, have only ONE child, because of overpopulation!!


If homosexuality is taken out, what will be the 'future' population?

Think about it!

2007-09-17 05:03:49 · answer #6 · answered by Paul222@England 5 · 3 0

And your point is?

That is why not everyone is homosexual, that is why we have a society that has all types of people, with different sexual preferences.

If everyone was infertile, how would mankind survive beyond one generation? (Same question)

2007-09-17 04:30:13 · answer #7 · answered by Sapere Aude 5 · 3 0

If homosexuality was caused by a genetic mutation, and gay people were physically incabable of producing children, this might be a valid question. Happily, the former proposition appears increasingly unlikely, and the latter is entirely untrue. Exactly how would "everybody" become homosexual then? Exposure to liberal propaganda? Declining church attendance? Demonic possession? Get a grip.

2007-09-17 04:30:26 · answer #8 · answered by brokendaystar 1 · 4 1

I don't understand the logic behind this argument, why would every person on earth be gay? Some are and some aren't, get over it! And if for some reason everyone were gay, they could choose to have a child, or artificially inseminate a woman....But i mean come on, do people sit around thinking of dumb sh*t like this?

2007-09-17 04:31:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Turkey Basters

2007-09-17 04:37:46 · answer #10 · answered by Yoda 4 · 4 0

Like the selective service and registering for the draft all men would have to turn in a sperm sample at the age of 18. This would be files under the individual males traits. WHen women wanted children they could make a withdrwal and become inseminated.

Seee how easy that is?

2007-09-17 04:25:45 · answer #11 · answered by bryanccfshr 3 · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers