If you had to choose one side as the winner of this ongoing debate, which would it be?
2007-09-17 04:14:08 · 18 answers · asked by Subconsciousless 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Neither, as a skeptic I think the endless debate and rude behavior on both sides is pointless.
2007-09-17 04:22:41 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are far greater Theists on R&S than atheists. the worldwide embody 97% Theists and suitable 3% Atheists. There provide it some theory. Have faith high priced friends in God. John 3:sixteen Romans 10:9
2016-11-15 11:02:17 · answer #2 · answered by tahir 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are far more Theists on R&S than atheists. The world consist of 97% Theists and only 3% Atheists. There you have it.
Have faith dear friends in God.
John 3:16
Romans 10:9
2007-09-18 13:44:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could not choose theism, even from an objective viewpoint. Or if I were to evaluate the arguments from an objective view theist's most compelling argument is pascal's wager and that is a really poor reason to believe in anything.
The more theist arguments I read here, the more convinced that if a deity exists, it does not want me as a follower. Either that or theists have absolutely no clue as to what evidence is....
2007-09-17 04:28:49 · answer #4 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well "some" of the "more popular" arguments made by Christians on here I would have to say that the atheist might have a more convincing argument.
Yet, that is why I am here. To provide more intelligent, rational, and open minded thoughts in this great and ongoing discussion.
So if you asked are my arguments winning or the atheist, I would clearly say that mine were winning. But wouldn't we all? Otherwise they wouldn't be our arguments.
***UPDATE***
What? I haven't been stoned yet? LoL
2007-09-17 04:26:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't choose... Its an inherently unsound argument, because at the core of every deists belief system is an unmeasurable, unquantifiable attribute.. that of "Faith". They say you can't argue with Fauth, and its true, because no matter how many holes you think you've punched in their argument, or how mnay proofs you need them to supply, their argument always comes back to Faith. That is the building stone of their arguments, and it is unlogical and irrational. Thus you can neither argue with them, nor decalre a winner. If this was debate style, though... I'd have to choose athiests by default.
2007-09-17 04:24:41 · answer #6 · answered by BROOOOOKLYN 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On this site? Atheists. But basically because their stance is a simple one. The Christians have several good debaters, but they are far out-weighed by the idiotic responses by other Christians. What everyone needs to do is read a really good NDE.
2007-09-17 04:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Facts verses Mythology? Atheists-Winner
2007-09-17 04:22:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No theist I have seen so far has acknowledged once that their questions about evolution/science are remarkably ignorant, often below 5th grade.
And they are. But they won't admit it. So what to do? Arguing from fear, ignorance and dishonesty is not particularly a better case than someone arguing from fact.
2007-09-17 04:28:54 · answer #9 · answered by Bajingo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, most of the time, theists refuse to open there minds to FACTS, and at least consider some of our points, and I would like to say the atheists are winning, but i don't know how you would go about proving that.
2007-09-17 04:23:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋