you cant.
2007-09-17 02:23:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by tiggis2006 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
The only thing I believe to be true is no one knows the whole story. Agnostic is the most truthful religion ever.
2007-09-17 02:28:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is only the most truthful one for me. Since it involves what I feel and what is in my heart, there is no need for me to prove the truthfulness of mine or to disprove the religion of others,
2007-09-17 02:25:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by tuswecaoyate 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
who can prove "truth"? so the question takes some steps back first.
Religion is man's way of explaining the unknown, so it is myth laced with a sense of purpose. It does not need truth, does it?
2007-09-17 02:32:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you really want to know? than pls listen to these online free video lectures, and you will understand the truth, there are many subject in this web, i strongly recomend you to listen all of these luctures!!
http://www.worldmuslimmedia.com/readislam/zakir/
2007-09-17 02:43:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am christian I can not prove it is the only true religion but I know it is true because Jesus is in my life.
2007-09-17 02:28:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it somewhat is all assertion and presupposition. till God is performing to you himself in a fashion which you're useful isn't a hallucination or figment of your mind's eye, you're no longer listening to God, you're listening to those that declare they communicate for God, or who declare to by some ability be conscious of what God needs or approves of. No textual content fabric is rather Gods word, at maximum, they're collections of writings by ability of adult adult males, different human beings, that declare to chat for God, or declare to have had supernatural reviews quickly led to by ability of God. it somewhat is entire authority rests on your willingness to take their claims as real. And because of the actuality all those adult adult males are ineffective (so which you won't be in a position to precisely meet them and length them up your self), and none of their supernatural claims have EVER been backed by ability of empirical info, it somewhat is rather does require a "leap of religion" to have faith that the claims they make are easy. it somewhat is the main important difference, i think of, between atheists and theists, the willingness to make that leap and in basic terms "have faith" that those human beings weren't mendacity, or could no longer have lied. in my opinion, i want greater valid evidence than logically improper arguments and unsupported assertions. it rather is why i'm an agnostic atheist, I in basic terms admit i do no longer be conscious of if God exists or no longer, yet i'm no longer approximately to have faith till the excuses for my concept are valid.
2017-01-02 07:25:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
All religions are just that ie beliefs and a belief is based on acceptance and not on proofs.How do you prove a belief?
2007-09-17 02:29:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by brkshandilya 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I feel myself being forced to conclude that religious believers have no concept of evidence or scientific process.
2007-09-17 02:25:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I never claimed my religion (Buddhism) was the most truthful. It's just the one that works for me. I can't prove any of it, and neither can anyone of any other religion. In that regard, my religion is just as true as theirs.
2007-09-17 02:24:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I believe in objective truth.
It proves itself.
2007-09-17 02:27:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by harshmistressmoon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋