The "sanctuary" argument holds no weight legally. There is nothing, apart from possible bad publicity, to prevent the police from getting an arrest warrant and executing that arrest warrant in a church. So I don't think any laws need to be changed.
2007-09-16 20:46:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thomas M 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
some human beings tend to forget approximately one million, that a central authority is a collection of folk given the interest of maximum advantageous a society to a greater advantageous state "the government is my Shepherd I shall not prefer" 2, place brings with it responsibly, and not potential. 3, it is far less annoying responsible others than to discover a answer to the actual concern The strategies of any chief are individuals that they lead, a foul workmen blades his strategies. 4, If everybody is often informed via mass exposure that they like, prefer, can not do with out, and are not something in the event that they don't have. Then they'll do what ever they could to be what they have been informed to be. 5, gross inequality breads discontent. 6, human beings persist with the example set via others and if the ruling type show that greed,deception, theft, and homicide is the example then that's what you ought to have on your society. 7, If the scientific care isn't working and the affected person is getting worse it's time to alter the scientific care. 8, the international isn't Black and White, there is often yet another alliterative!
2016-12-17 03:12:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. The church helped an illegal who refused to be deported, stole someones i.d. and worked at an international airport using this fake information. The church aided a criminal. This criminal had already been deported once, broke back into this country to drop her anchor baby and then expect to live happily ever after. The church should not aid criminals in any way other than to help them to tell the truth and learn to pay for their crimes.
2007-09-20 17:09:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by BAS 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christianity does not have authority over the civil authority.
But God does have authority of Christians.
Christians reside in their own nations, but as resident aliens. They participate in all things as citizens and endure all things as foreigners. They obey the established laws and their way of life surpasses the laws.
The citizen is obliged in conscience not to follow the directives of civil authorities when they are contrary to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or the teachings of the Gospel.
We must obey God rather than men. (Acts 5:29)
Christians who disobey immoral laws are fully aware that they may be persecuted for standing up for what is right.
For more information, see the Catechism of the Catholic Church, sections 2240-2242: http://www.nccbuscc.org/catechism/text/pt3sect2chpt2.htm#2240
With love in Christ.
2007-09-18 18:12:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How people love to trot out the separation of church and state!
The US Constitution stipulates that the government will not establish a state religion, nor interfere in the free expression of anyone's religious beliefs. That's it. None of the never-the-twain-shall-meet idea that so many Americans have about their own Constitution.
Now, to your question. Are you talking about churches offering sanctuary to illegal aliens, for example people being ordered deported? I think it is a bum idea, trotted out by misguided Christians who misunderstand their own beliefs and the laws of their own country.
2007-09-16 19:05:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pagan Dan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Legal citizens of the USA are human also. They are in need of jobs, health care, etc.
We have a responsibility to the legal citizens first.
Why don't the people who feel so sorry for illegal immigrants go to the illegals country of origin and bash that government' protest that government, instead of bashing this government
Come on! I dare you!
2007-09-17 01:28:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by jobgonetocheaplabor 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The government should be kept out of churches as much as possible, though if reasonable concern that crime is being protected there, the churches doors need to be rammed open.
2007-09-16 19:21:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
An illegal one, yes. There should be a separation of Church and State, always.
2007-09-16 18:42:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fox_America 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
They should lose their tax exempt status at the very least.
2007-09-16 18:46:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
No. Churches shouldn't be related to politics. Unless you want alot of pastors to throw crosses at you and set you on fire.
2007-09-16 18:40:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋