Global Warming: reasons why it's not caused by man?

Question

there are several arguments that state global warming is not necessarily caused by humans.

Answer 1

There is good reason to believe it is caused by the sun.
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Reference_Docs/The_Geologic_Record_and_Climate_Change.pdf

Read this account about how a firm believer turned into a skeptic, and how when the evidence changed he also changed his mind.
http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/evans.pdf

Answer 2

i'm a geologist and characteristic studied this concern somewhat to lots. worldwide warming could ensue if human beings weren't right here. we are how ever rushing up the progression of this adventure; in no way ignore we nonetheless are in an ice age. The earth will cycle by way of heat and chilly spells around each and every 4 hundred,000 years. there are a number of distinctive reasons for this warming and cooling style and one reason on my own won't carry replace. The media only needs a narrative to disguise, and characteristic shown that they are very inept at information the very complicated situation. CO2, delo oxygen sixteen, 18 isotopes, Methane gas, the checklist is going on and on. that's no longer an ordinary situation to understand and you're able to desire to recollect on occasion while human beings do no longer understand the concern because of the fact they do no longer learn it, the concern would properly be "dumbed" down lots that it is not appropriate anylonger. Milankovitch cycles play in basic terms a small place, and that they choose different factors to be occuring on a similar time to relax off the earth. what's occurring to earth has got here approximately thousands and thousands of cases interior the previous yet recorded human documents have not been around long adequate to declare without shadow of a doubt that we are what's inflicting this adventure.

Answer 3

Global Warming is natural for certain degree, i.e portion of "green areas" and human used up areas. Human population increase is still considerable "natural" therefore global warming has it's direct formula in it.

But why is that very obvious nowadays (up-trend since 1920s)until many of the countries faces dreadful humid now??

The world's richest economy is also its biggest carbon dioxide emitter, pushing out 5.8 billion metric tons in 2003. China, in second place, emitted 3.5 billion, with all of Western Europe at 3.9 billion. The reasons are...

1. Carbon Dioxide emission by techno-industry. (as many of us agree).

2. Carbon Dioxide emission by overpopulated animals raised for food (There are now 20 billion livestock on Earth—more than triple the number of human beings. —World Watch Paper. World meat production has quadrupled in the last 50 years....and this only a beginning!! ). Furthermore large portion of the world's forests had been cleared for this purpose. In Brazil alone, the equivalent of 5.6 million acres of land is used to grow soya beans for animals in Europe. Nearly half of the water and 80 percent of the agricultural land in the United States are used to raise animals for food. and...how about other parts of the world??

I based to fact & figures, given by relevant authorities. Unless someone can out-smart the experts, come with million years statistics!!

Answer 4

because it has been going on for centuries. we are just now noticing it. second not all scientists are paid by corporations that stand to benefit from increased co2 production. many scientists are not paid anything by these.

second enviromentalist were started by corporations such as the morgans and rockerfellers, who incidentaly started up the united nations,, how ironic, how contradictory. unless you know their true motives. the best way to get people to go along with developing their own poverty is to scare the daylights out of them. what better way then to make them feel guilty about their prosperity while most nations are impoverished, and what better way to get people to give up that prosperity without a fight.

taxation is what they are after, if they can get people to back a co2 tax look out. the united nations would have found their own funding and not need the us government's funding anymore. this would be only a start, as the global warming is said not to be reducing, the taxes have to go up to force people to use less, see where I am going with this? tax us once will lead to more and more until we are taxed to death.

it is all about power. less wealth we have the more they control us. the less say we have over our lives and the less we own. it is about stealth tactics to enslave us. since they know a frontal attack will fail.

RRRRR

Answer 5

Thirty percent of the earth’s entire land surface – a massive 70% of all agricultural land - is used for rearing farmed animals. Then how could be the human population cause by men.

It has been researched & "measured" that animals (of course mainly overpopulated for human food) 4 ot more times larger than man do. This has been proven by valid researcher panels and institutions.

Unless someone come up with a "independant" experts or private scientist to prove otherwise.

Answer 6

WOW! apparently, according to YA, people who deny global warming are part of a corporate conspiracy. Get real, both sides stand to make a porfit.

Global warming gets brought into the spotlight, and low and behold; green building, honda, toyota, energy efficient appliances, and more boom. So more than just "big bad oil" is involved in this.

Answer 7

The extent to which the warming is caused by humans is uncertain. Nobody denies that ice ages and warming periods have occurred in the past. Is this warming really different? The UN IPCC says it was warmer in the year 1000 than it was in the year 2000. But how reliable is historical temperature data? Are they not really estimates? And if estimates are less than their margins of error are they not statistical noise? Do we completely understand how changes in solar radiation affects the climate on earth? What about volcanic activity? The earth is full of molten goo. Most volcanoes are submarine. To what degree does underwater eruptions affect ocean temperatures? To what degree does ocean temperatures affect atmospheric temperatures? What is the time delay in the effect? Two years? Fifty years? How much do we know about undersea volcanic activity? How many climate models even attempt to account for this potential effect?

The list of unknowns goes on forever. Global warming evangelists are adept at not hearing what they don't want to hear but an honest person faithful to the scientific method will admit that there's much uncertainty in climate science.

Answer 8

Large corporations who stand to lose money if more environmentally friendly technology comes online have created these stories, which have twisted somewhat true facts way around. Carbon Dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas is naturally occurring gas in the atmosphere. Problems have arisen though because we have concentrated the amounts in the atmosphere by three to four times as much. The earth goes through periods of global warming and cooling, and this cycle we are embarking on has been scientifically proven to be man-made, as records show these kinds of temperature changes shouldn't occur for thousands and thousands of years.

Answer 9

Solar activity, orbital variation, volcanic out gassing, evaporation (warmer currents, as in El Nino, promote evaporation, more water vapour, more heat), just to name a few.

Maybe on a global scale we don't quite have the effect we think we have, y'know, with all the bloated egos out there.

Answer 10

And here are several explanations why the arguments that it's not (mostly) caused by humans are wrong.

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462

Answer 11

its just 1% of global worming factor caused by the world itself, like volcano eruption. but, the other 99% caused by human. dont deny we do that everyday...