English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-16 13:10:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

73 books.

The 7 books removed from Protestant Bibles are known by Catholics as the "Deuterocanonical Books" and by Protestants as the "Apocrypha."

The canon of the Old Testament that Catholics use is based on the text used by Alexandrian Jews, a version known as the "Septuagint" and which came into being around 280 B.C. as a translation of then existing texts from Hebrew into Greek by 72 Jewish scribes (the Torah was translated first, around 300 B.C., and the rest of Tanach was translated afterward).

The Septuagint is the Old Testament referred to in the Didache or "Doctrine of the Apostles" (first century Christian writings) and by Origen, Irenaeus of Lyons, Hippolytus, Tertullian, Cyprian of Carthage, Justin Martyr, St. Augustine and the vast majority of early Christians who referenced Scripture in their writings. The Epistle of Pope Clement, written in the first century, refers to the Books Ecclesiasticus and Wisdom, analyzed the book of Judith, and quotes sections of the book of Esther that were removed from Protestant Bibles.


In the 16th c., Luther, reacting to serious abuses and clerical corruption in the Latin Church, to his own heretical theological vision (see articles on sola scriptura and sola fide), and, frankly, to his own inner demons, removed those books from the canon that lent support to orthodox doctrine, relegating them to an appendix. Removed in this way were books that supported such things as prayers for the dead (Tobit 12:12; 2 Maccabees 12:39-45), Purgatory (Wisdom 3:1-7), intercession of dead saints (2 Maccabees 15:14), and intercession of angels as intermediaries (Tobit 12:12-15). Ultimately, the "Reformers" decided to ignore the canon determined by the Christian Councils of Hippo and Carthage.

The Latin Church in no way ignored the post-Temple rabbincal texts. Some Old Testament translations of the canon used by the Latin Church were also based in part on rabbinical translations, for example St. Jerome's 5th c. Latin translation of the Bible called the Vulgate.

The "Masoretic texts" refers to translations of the Old Testament made by rabbis between the 6th and 10th centuries; the phrase doesn't refer to ancient texts in the Hebrew language. Some people think that the Masoretic texts are the "original texts" and that, simply because they are in Hebrew, they are superior.

Some Protestants claim that the "Apocrypha" are not quoted in the New Testament so, therefore, they are not canonical.
Going by that standard of proof, we'd have to throw out Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 2 Kings, 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Lamentations, Obadiah, Nahum, and Zephaniah because none of these Old Testament Books are quoted in the New Testament.


But there is a bigger lesson in all this confusion over not only the canon but proper translation of the canon , especially considering that even within the Catholic Church there have been differing opinions by individual theologians about the proper place of the deuterocanonicals (not that an individual theologian's opinions count for Magisterial teaching!).
The lesson, though, is this: relying on the "Bible alone" is a bad idea; we are not to rely solely on Sacred Scripture to understand Christ's message. While Scripture is "given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" (2 Timothy 3:16-17), it is not sufficient for reproof, correction and instruction in righteousness.
It is the Church that is the "pillar and ground of Truth" (1 Timothy 3:15)!
Jesus did not come to write a book; He came to redeem us, and He founded a Sacramental Church through His apostles to show us the way.
It is to them, to the Church Fathers, to the Sacred Deposit of Faith, to the living Church that is guided by the Holy Spirit, and to Scripture that we must prayerfully look.

2007-09-20 06:27:00 · answer #1 · answered by cashelmara 7 · 0 1

The Protestant English Bible contains 66 books. These are broken down into two Testaments, the Old and New.

In the Old Testament, there are five books of the Law, twelve historical books, five books of poetry/wisdom, and seventeen books by prophets.

The New Testament has four Gospels, one historical book, twenty-one letters by or for apostles, and one prophecy book.

I hope that helps!

2007-09-16 13:19:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

66 Total=

39 Old Testament
27 New Testament

2007-09-16 13:16:07 · answer #3 · answered by ϑennaß 7 · 2 2

66

2007-09-16 13:17:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

66

2007-09-16 13:16:20 · answer #5 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 2 1

66

2007-09-16 13:24:06 · answer #6 · answered by HAND 5 · 2 1

66

2007-09-16 13:14:16 · answer #7 · answered by Cee T 6 · 3 2

The protestant bibles usually have 66 books.

The catholic bible has a few more.

If you are interested in the books that have been removed, google the apocrypha.

2007-09-16 13:15:50 · answer #8 · answered by CC 7 · 3 1

My Bible contains 6 books, the Gospel of Matthew, the Gospel of Mark, the Gospel of Luke, the Gospel of John, the book of Revelation, and the book of Daniel.

These are the only books Jesus commanded that we read.

2007-09-16 13:18:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Ah, the old question of the Canon of Scripture. As others have mentioned, it depends on who you ask.

The Ethiopians have the largest Canon.

2007-09-16 13:38:21 · answer #10 · answered by Hoosier Daddy 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers