English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So, obviously, "God" ALWAYS expected them to have sex. So there's nothing wrong with it. End of story.

2007-09-16 05:58:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

There is nothing wrong with it in the first place.. geez wer did you get the idea of it being wrong.

Morally incest IS wrong... in the bible... premarital IS wrong.... just watever you believe you animal.

2007-09-16 06:07:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course we were meant to have sex, and there is nothing wrong with sex when it's in the right context. Just because God created something doesn't mean there are no guidelines for using it. I do see where you are coming from though, because there are some Christians who regard sex as "icky" and even within marrige something you do just for procreation not enjoyment. These people need to read Song of Solomon and see that God did create sex for our enjoyment.

2007-09-16 13:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by GrizzlyMint 6 · 0 0

The issue isn't about having sex. One could infer that Adam and Eve had sex in the Garden of Eden. But, they were completely innocent.

Many religious people think that sex is for procreation only. Hence, if you are having sex for pleasure, it is wrong.

2007-09-16 13:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by Your Best Fiend 6 · 1 0

It was Adam and Eve, not Ken and Barbie. Whoever said they weren't supposed to have sex? And no, there's nothing wrong with it.

2007-09-16 13:11:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, there is nothing wrong with sex between a married man and woman as God intended then, and now.

2007-09-16 13:02:49 · answer #5 · answered by The Cub 4 · 1 1

YES, God even told them to multiply and become many and to fill the earth.

2007-09-16 13:12:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I know! Hilarious isn't it? The Bible is such a load of crap. It was written simply to make women subservient and children abusable.

2007-09-16 13:02:38 · answer #7 · answered by 2bzy 6 · 4 0

You should add that there was no way for them to marry either.

2007-09-16 13:06:07 · answer #8 · answered by x2000 6 · 0 0

I like the way you think.

2007-09-16 13:02:42 · answer #9 · answered by Chapter and Verse 7 · 1 0

Was that a Brain-fart?

2007-09-16 13:05:18 · answer #10 · answered by Premaholic 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers