English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't get the notion. I know technically to have romantic love you have to have sexual attraction right? Well isn't that lust, so isn't that wrong?

Like and also like I don't get this but yeah don't call me bi or a lesbian but... like I fell in love with a girl once like my best friend. I didn't want to 'do her' in the sense or wanted or 'had to' but I wanted to kiss her and hold her (but nothing more) I guess like a romantic friendship, since having sex would have meant lust or lost of innocence. I guess you could have said it wouldn't have mattered if we had that kind of relationship since we we're soo close. Although I wasn't sexually attracted to her I would have gave my body for the sake of love and unity. So what does that mean isn't that true love? I kind of got crushed kind of like a heart break when she said no btw. so what was that?

For guys I like them and I'm sexually but like i'dd have sex out of lust, I'm not sure I could fall, 'fall in love' with them?

2007-09-16 03:51:11 · 3 answers · asked by marie_the_blue 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

Me and that chick now consider ourselves soulsisters so.

2007-09-16 03:51:48 · update #1

3 answers

With the added comment about being soul sisters, Id say you answered your own question. Its possible to be bisexual, but as you dont get as much feeling for guys as for this girl then you go figure.

2007-09-16 04:01:43 · answer #1 · answered by jms043 7 · 0 0

True love is respect for the other person. You put their needs before yours and you want the best for them no matter what. It is not selfish.

2007-09-16 10:57:45 · answer #2 · answered by sonia 1 · 0 0

Something that cannot be explained in words.

2007-09-16 11:06:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers