Would not the sheer high temperatures of the energy displacement incinerate all organic type matter before it could even get started?
How could organic matter even begin let alone be transported through space without food or an atmosphere if meteors seeded the Earh as one such hypothesis suggest?
2007-09-15 18:35:34 · 13 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
- or meteorites - (above)
2007-09-15 18:41:07 · update #1
Dreamstuff Entity (below) Abiogenesis is yet another hypothesis stack upon a mountain of other theories. Yet you make this baseless statement as though it were fact.
Your listed outcomes also resulted in inorganic matter which does not address this question. Can you say misdirection?
2007-09-15 18:57:57 · update #2
There was no organic matter in any part of the universe until several hundreds of millions of years after the big bang.
2007-09-15 18:43:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Posting a science question in the religion and spirituality section often means the asker does not really want an answer. His goal is to ask a question that he believes proves some scientific knowledge to be wrong, or that science does not yet answer, and make the implicit claim that the only other explanation is a god, and specifically, the same god he happens to believe in.
It's the "god of the gaps" - intellectually bankrupt, since it favors ignorance instead of knowledge, and because of the contained logical fallacy.
However, on the off chance that you really want to know the answer:
1. The total entropy of the universe at the start of the big bang was minimal, perhaps almost zero. Because it was so compact, it had considerably more order than the universe we are in now. The complexity we observe around us today can be produced from the ultimate order of the hot but cooling gas of the big bang.
2. The big bang was not an explosion. It was an expansion. Besides the fact that it got bigger over time, the big bang has almost nothing in common with an explosion.
3. Explosions do produce some order amidst their other effects:
* Large surface explosions, such as nuclear bombs, produce the familiar mushroom clouds. There are not very highly ordered, but they are not purely random, either.
* Supernovae produce heavy elements, and the shock waves from them compress interstellar gases, which begins the formation of new stars.
* Powerful explosions can compress carbon into diamond crystals, the most ordered arrangement.
* Explosions of atomized gasoline produce compressed gas, which is harnessed in internal combustion engines to power automobiles and other equipment.
---
Organic compounds happened on earth, thank you. Look up abiogenesis.
2007-09-16 01:47:38 · answer #2 · answered by Dreamstuff Entity 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I do agree that The Big Bang asks many more questions than it answers. Even if all those things you mentioned worked out to create some form of life. What are the odds that these forms of life would have exactly everything they needed to continue living (Legs, Stomachs, brains, Eyeballs, all the blood vessels, nerves, skin and every other part of the human body that is so incredibly complicated and how do they all work together in such a near perfect way) And that these forms of life can procreate is even more incredible.
2007-09-16 02:23:49 · answer #3 · answered by lcpl.christian 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OR plant the stars in a relatively even manner?
The BB was not a theory, but put out there to think about. Look it up for yourself.
Science can not have even a theory on singularities. That's the reasoning behind not being able to prove or theorize a true healing ever happened, as it is a singularity.
2007-09-16 01:43:19 · answer #4 · answered by Blank 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Organic matter wasn't created in the Big Bang, if that's what you're getting at.
2007-09-16 01:50:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You need to be asking this question in the science section not R & S. Why your asking it in R & S? Cause you want ur fellow theists to come here and agree with you that "big bang" and "evolution" is just a lie. then your gonna award them the best answer, even though they dont quite answer your question as much as they boost your ego.
2007-09-16 01:41:58 · answer #6 · answered by Menon R 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
These are question that our brains are too underdeveloped to answer.
But it doesn't mean we have to invent gods and demons to fill in the gaps in our knowledge.
2007-09-16 02:20:52 · answer #7 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That was made up by a guy.
Being a woman, I can tell you, I think the universe was created with a little more thought, gentleness and agony...like a child being born.
2007-09-16 01:42:14 · answer #8 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
obviously life came about much after the exploding singularity
2007-09-16 01:44:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We don't know: The evolutionists haven't figured that out yet!
2007-09-16 02:04:09 · answer #10 · answered by ϑennaß 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋