Here's an economic reason why I think religion is a bad idea:
Of course I'm assuming religion as superfluous, which of course isn't completely true.
1. Full-time clergy don't help the economy in any way, because they don't work. They just spend the money that is given to them and make a living off of that. In my books, they must as well count as the unemployed.
2. Theists donate money to the church, now I know some of it goes to charity but the other half goes to upkeep, contruction of churches and the paying full-time clergy. It's much better to just donate directly to a charity.
3. The money people donate takes away from people's disposable income. The more disposable income you have the more money you save. The more savings people have the the more money is invested into the bank or businesses. This leads us closer to the Golden Rule savings rate (ie. the consumption per efficiency unit of labour is maximized when we reach the Golden Rule savings rate)
2007-09-15
17:22:52
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry about being so insensitive but economics is based on presumptions.
I know that religion helps a lot of people, I just think there's more efficient ways to be helped.
2007-09-15
17:24:33 ·
update #1
I said full-time clergy several times.
2007-09-15
17:31:23 ·
update #2