There are thousands of people in DC right now and yahoo is talking about a donkey in a well, Cnn is talking about crap in the middle east and others are talking about Paris or Britney? There are thousands of people in DC trying to oust the President of the USA, why is this not in Media Coverage!?
2007-09-15 08:44:18 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
It wasn't a rally to impeach Bush, it was a rally to end the war.
And it was on the news. I don't know what time you posted your question, but the protesters didn't start marching until around 2 p.m., it takes a bit of time to write and post an article or video clip.
2007-09-15 15:02:01 · answer #1 · answered by Ashley 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
previous information. the only people who care are people affected by BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome). this is a set of whiny little brats who've no longer something greater effectual to do than stand around moaning approximately how terrible existence is with Bush interior the workplace. yet once you ask "How is your existence worse?" they initiate screaming idiotic, pointless and unprovable reasons. the information might desire to be reporting on GoE (amassing of eagles), flow u.s. forward and all the different counter protests that are showing that people are actually not as gullible, ignorant and hate crammed as those "Anti-Bush" zealots. it is the real tale. no longer a set of crybabies that throw tantrums via fact the international isn't the way they decide on it.
2016-12-13 10:04:44 · answer #2 · answered by hokenson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most likely because the White House Press Corps wants it that way. Since the major media tv and radio stations are owned by major PAC contributors and media is manipulated, it's unlikely to be covered or coverage will be very little.
I did see a little blurb about it on ABC today, though.
2007-09-15 13:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Haven't you heard about the free world, the free press, freedom of expression, civil society, democracy, and stuff like that?
It is a bit tough to explain, but what you are talking about is a manifestation of some of those issues!
2007-09-16 10:44:06 · answer #4 · answered by Nader Ali 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually that news tid bit is all over the internet news sites, don't you know that you can't get real news from the television. Plus, the march is pointless and is just symbolic; there is no where near enough support to get President Bush impeached.
2007-09-15 08:48:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Because the People don't Impeach anyone, it is up to the congress, who even though controlled by Democrats, have more sense than you.
There is no impeachable offense with which to charge our president.
Get over it.
2007-09-15 09:57:30 · answer #6 · answered by Mark A 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I was watching the demonstration in DC. It seemed to be ANTI-WAR in nature. Not an impeachment proceedure.
2007-09-15 15:26:20 · answer #7 · answered by Angel Primeau 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
the media onjly covers things that they feel they can make a buck off of, or twist around to make a buck. maybe the language isn't plain enough, they got to make more noise or do something dramatic , like have a million person march on the capitol with ****** ********* ******** of bush.
2007-09-16 04:22:55 · answer #8 · answered by nocateman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Rupert Murdoch owns the media. And guess who owns him?
2007-09-16 14:20:52 · answer #9 · answered by trippedits 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they are commercial operations and the "rally" doesn't amount to even a "blip" on the ratings chart. However it does bring to mind a revision of a very popular t-shirt slogan from the Vietnam Era: "What if they had a rally and no one noticed?".
2007-09-15 09:10:05 · answer #10 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋