English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hitler was a Christian. But he didn't called a terrorist.

2007-09-15 08:03:58 · 16 answers · asked by kabduk 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

The total Muslim population in the world to-day is around 1.4 billions. That is every fifth man in the world is a Muslim. Further, Islam is the only religion whose members swell because of voluntary conversion, particularly in the West.
Ever since the Soviet Union broke and six contiguous Muslim countries of Central Asia became independent in1991,vested interests have led the solo world Super Power- USA to beleve that Islam and its Shariyath Laws pose the greatest danger to
Western Society.
The zionists who were systematically decimated by Christians of Europe under the "pogroms", sought asylum in Palestine in 1900s,
During the World War II(1939-45),
the zionists formed many secret armies to attack the British and the local Palestinians.
In 1942 the zionists planted powerful bombs in prestigious King James Hotel, in Jerusalem, disguised as Arab workers! The hotel which srved as HQ of British Govt and army vertically split! And through further acts of terrorism the zionists drove away the Palestinians!
Yasser Arafath paid them in their own coin
adopting their tested terrorist tactics.! The secret zionist armies which adopted terrorstic methods to secure Israel state in 1948 has come out brandishing Muslims as Terrorists. USA, which is much obliged to the Zionists,of late, acts as a 'robot' of Israel!
Bush's invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 have proved to the World as to "Who is the real Terrorist"?
By all means call those who indulge in terroristic activities as terrorists, but do not label them as Islamic Terrorists. They have no Islamic objective to achieve through their dastardly acts. As in the past mud slinging against Islam would further push
the West into worse agony.

2007-09-15 14:19:09 · answer #1 · answered by The Tribune 5 · 3 1

First of all NOT ALL MUSLIMS are terrorist, only those that would use the beliefs of Mohammad and the words of the scared book of Quran too justify the "terrorist, butchered activity".

But those that do use terror to kill, control, and advance their cause, are terrorist.

As for Crusaders, just say the word, that will bring the vision of horrors of horrors to the surface of anyone that has a bit of history lessons, however they mostly were in the form of an advancing army, be it Christian or not.

as for Zionists....as you call them, where indeed pushing too for their "special" place in the world and used what methods there where at the time.

As for Hitler being a Christian certainly he was born one but in any ones book it was a equal opportunist when it came to killing........Christians, Jews, all believers, what we might say.....as an adult.....a state believer, that the state was the beginning and end to all mans problems. The state was god, gods, Allah, and whatever. There was no tolerance for any alliance to anything but the STATE...

2007-09-15 11:17:47 · answer #2 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 0 0

you're incorrect. What provides muslims a faux label, a generalisation, IS terrorism by ability of muslims, globally, and on a every day foundation. It has got here approximately at present and it will ensue lower back the next day. There seems to be no end to it. if your fellow muslims ALL stopped the death and destruction that's occurring every day, then the generalisation could only pass way, finally. remember this: no longer all muslims are terrorists (I, too, have muslim friends) yet almost all terrorists are muslim. Islam, in regardless of interpretation, has delivered the generalisation label upon its participants all by ability of itself. It did no longer take any exterior assistance. what style of society creates death and destruction while yet another usa workouts its authentic to unfastened speech and publishes some cartoons of Mohammed? the place became into the wear in that? Now come on!! Do you no longer realize that pictorial representations of Mohammed existed way till now in historic past and exist to this present day., created by ability of followers of Islam. It does look that something that muslims do no longer accept as true with is immediately to be responded to with highway riots, innocents killed, regular destruction of sources ... that's no longer civilised. that's why you have this label linked. be conscious properly: we are no longer stupid. we've had an preparation. We understand all approximately generalising and stereotyping. only because of the fact Osama BL is a terrorist does no longer recommend that all people interior the bin weighted down kinfolk is a terrorist. that is evidently stupid. we are no longer stupid. faith is a curse upon mankind. there's a treatment.

2016-11-14 12:46:09 · answer #3 · answered by weatherby 4 · 0 0

Its the media and politicians who are spreading the message and targetting the Muslims.Who knows the real story behind the attacks.Anyone can claim they are responsible and belong to this group or that group just to spoil the name of Muslims.Many rational people have realised this and also the fact that it could be that behind all this there is a foreign hand involved.

Hitler is not the only one,what about the modern US govt and Bush,what about Mr.Modi but these people are clever enough to hide behind politics and do things in their way.

Re: the Jews ,my question for them are what is happening at Jerusalem and near the wailing wall ,where thousands of innocent people are killed because they are Muslims.They say Jews are peaceful is real joke,they stab everyone in the back instead of doing it openly.

2007-09-15 10:06:41 · answer #4 · answered by eskay 3 · 1 1

muslims are not called terrorists, radical jihadists are. Hitler was also a terrorist, but in the 1930's and 40's different words were used to describe it. The whole crusaders thing makes it sound like this is the middle ages and as america is a secular country i dont see a connection. As far as zionists go, i figure they should just fight it out and see who wins, like what happened to the native americans.....maybe our military should hand out smallpox infested blankets again.

2007-09-15 08:14:01 · answer #5 · answered by geekydude 2 · 1 3

As salaamu 'alaikym, my friend.

It was once said that history is written by the victors, meaning that how one views the "facts" of any past situation, occurrence, event, etc., should be considered from the vantage point of those who are viewing the same.

I am certain that Osama bin Laden does not consider himself a terrorist. Neither did Hitler, Stalin, Chairman Mao, nor does George W. Bush, despite the fact that the victims of these persons and of their personal "crusades" do view them as such.

It is also politically wise to label ones "enemies" in such a manner as to make them appear less than human so that it makes it easier and more comfortable for one supporters to kill them. (It is hard to actually kill someone whom you view as being just as human as you view yourself to be but, at least historically, very easy to kill those whom one views as sub-human.)

The west will never label the Christian nor the Jewish extremist as "terrorist" because they support these groups for both politcial and economic reasons.

The western media, which is commercially driven, panders to the whims and whiles of its audience so as to boost its ratings and gain a greater share of the market enabling it to make a greater profit. (One might say that their "profits" have led them astray...sorry for the pun.)

It should also be understood that if the state does something it is considered the will of the people even when they do not support the governments actions.
Terrorist, on the other hand, are always considered as outsiders and malcontents.

It is all ones point of view as in all reality, the truth is the truth regardless of how any person, groups or government twist the same. In the end, Allah, Subhanna wa Ta'ala, will judge, doing so by the "truth" as He and He alone can clearly discern the same.

Mas'a salaam.

2007-09-15 09:33:15 · answer #6 · answered by Big Bill 7 · 1 2

Terrorists come in all shapes, sizes, colors and different creeds. Hitler was a "Catholic" terrorist, but we didn't know a lot about "terrorists back in the 1930s-1940s.

2007-09-15 12:32:44 · answer #7 · answered by nobleservant 2 · 1 2

Hey I'm a Muslim.

Islam comes from the Arabic word, "salam," which means peace. This peace is acquired by submitting one's will to Almighty God. You cannot judge Islam because of the actions of a few people. For example, Timothy McVeigh, known as the "Oklahoma City Bomber," was a Catholic. Based on his actions, I cannot say that Christianity teaches people to blow up buildings and murder people. It is wrong to do that! I'm aware that people find some verses of the Qur'an to be violent, however, these people never look at the context of the verses. When you take verses out of context (which is happening quite often today), look at what happens! One can take verses from the Bible or the Torah, making them appear to be very violent books, filled with hatred, but that is not true! There are good Muslims and there are bad Muslims. There are good Christrians and there are bad Christians. There are good Jews and there are bad Jews. Violence is against every teaching of Islam. Also, no where in the teachings of Islam does it approve of terrorism. Islam is very peaceful and tolerant. The "Muslims" who are murdering innocent people and destroying families are only Muslims by name.

Please watch this lecture. It is by the brilliant Muslim scholar, Dr. Zakir Naik. The first minute and forty two seconds is just an introduction. The topic of the lecture is called, "Is terrorism a Muslim monopoly." Please watch! It is worth everyone's time.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=maY-kmTeIjc

I hope my answer has cleared up your misconception on Islam.

Thank you for your time.

2007-09-15 08:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by asdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdadasdads 2 · 2 4

Oh please! Hitler was not a Christian. He made it very clear that he was a "humanist". He executed Catholic leaders and Jehovahs Witnesses. To call Hitler a Christian is a pathetic attempt at diversion.
Zionists (Jews of which I am one) do not send our children out with bombs strapped to us. We do not teach hatred of non Jews by using childrens programming on TV. The Crusaders were Christian and were violent but that was a different time. I suppose with 21st century eyes they could be called terrorists. You don't find many people hijacking planes who are part of a Jewish, Mormon or Catholic terror cell.
Hitler, by the way, was a terrorist and the Nazi's were as well but make no mistake, they were not Christian.
When the vatican sends cells of suicide bombers out and Chabad Lubavitch sends Jews out to hijack plans to fly them into the towers in some Muslim country, then we will talk. Until then, Muslims are rightfully the religion of terror in the world (in general).

2007-09-15 08:17:20 · answer #9 · answered by Feivel 7 · 5 5

Christians own world press. They have advantage to label Muslim what ever they want. Muslims do not have their own media on international level, so Muslim can not express their opinion on label Christians give to Muslims.

2007-09-15 09:00:59 · answer #10 · answered by majeed3245 7 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers