It depends on if it is an everyday liberal or one of the elite. For example Joe the liberal on the street farts, the world gets a little warmer. If Hillary Clinton farts, then she can afford the methane credits to balance it out. If Al Gore farts the world gets a little cooler. LOL.
2007-09-15 01:52:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by adhd_riddled 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I have to disagree with adhd_riddled. With all the hot air Al Gore expels his farts would actually contribute to global warming...or is it now climate change. Keeping up with these socialist anti-capitalist, America hating, kool-aid drinking libs can be difficult at times. As for Hillary...when she farts it actually cools the environment, as she may be as cold as any woman alive.
Not sure why the alarmist do not explain Greenland's warm past or the effects on the sun on Earths climate. Yes, boys and girls the biggest contributor to fluctuations in temperature on the Earth is...Beuller...Beuller...yes the SUN. Check this link for more info about the global warming CRISIS! Oh my!
http://aproundtable.org/tps30info/globalwarmup.html
2007-09-18 18:17:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everybody farts. It is okay if they are in a well-ventilated room. If they're in the car they better crack a window fast or I'll do it for them!
But if everyone farted all the time, I suppose it might have a cummulative effect. Lots of people standing outside, for one.
2007-09-15 02:42:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you are on to something. It was a record cold night in Chicago last night. I think the only way that could have happened was perhaps because it was a "fart free" night also last night in Chicago. It seems that some more research needs to be done in this area. We might even conclude that it is not politically correct to eat beans and other gas producing foods, especially if you are a liberal.
2007-09-15 03:21:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It also counts (only a little, CO2 is a much bigger cause) when these people fart, and they're not liberals.
"Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming"
"Pat Robertson (very conservative Christian leader) 'It is getting hotter and the ice caps are melting and there is a build up of carbon dioxide in the air. We really need to do something on fossil fuels.”
Ford Motor Company CEO William Clay Ford, Jr. "I believe there is now more than enough evidence of climate change to warrant an immediate and comprehensive - but considered - response. Anyone who disagrees is, in my view, still in denial."
"The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."
James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.
"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."
Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart Company
"Republican governors team up against global warming"
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Republican_Governors_team_up_against_Global_0716.html
"the overwhelming number of scientists now believe that there is significant human cause,'' Giuliani said, adding the debate on the existence of global warming "is almost unnecessary ... ''
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/13/GIULIANI.TMP
"(from Republicans for Environmental Protection) The consensus of almost all climate scientists is that global warming is already happening, that human actions are causing it, and that it will cause major problems for our planet."
http://www.rep.org/news/GEvol5/ge5.1_globalwarming.html
"National Review published a cover story this past week calling on conservatives to shake off denial and get into the climate policy debate"
2007-09-15 03:50:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bob 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't know, but a Conservative's farts are so toxic that each fart is responsible for the death of three polar bears
2007-09-16 04:27:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It becomes more and more clear the conservatives want to have a government much like Russia had.
2007-09-18 13:36:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that is how silly you are making the argument.
2007-09-15 12:38:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
when an uneducated person without any background in earth science and chemistry asks a political question in the environment section just because he is angry at the world, is its ok?
Thanks again for the accurate representation of the "less than average" US citizen.
2007-09-15 02:07:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by NLBNLB 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Everything should be alright if they carry Listerine, eh? It would be environmentally friendly to swallow rather than spit it out, too.
2007-09-15 02:22:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Marilyn A 4
·
0⤊
0⤋