English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-14 17:45:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cycling

8 answers

I've done this before, it's not fun.

2007-09-15 00:15:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Running doesn't have any start up cost if you can find a place that's fairly low impact (trails or grass or a padded school track). Biking is really fun though, and gives a better overall workout. Start up costs though can run about $250 to $400 for a good dependable bike.

2007-09-15 22:48:09 · answer #2 · answered by ♫ giD∑■η ♫ 5 · 0 1

Biking is about 50 million* times more efficient

2007-09-15 01:41:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How about both?

Run when it rains [I'm always soaked anyway!] you don't have much time and you want a short intense workout.

Ride when you want to see some scenery, have no deadlines [or sometimes if you want to relax] or if you want a massive workout [time + distance].

Don't limit yourself get the best of both worlds...

2007-09-18 11:17:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

biking is low impact and much better on your joints but if your young and healthy running gets great results.

2007-09-15 00:48:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have heard of this. Is this the sport where you chase bike riders and bark like a dog? When you catch them, you dry hump them.

P

2007-09-18 18:31:57 · answer #6 · answered by PK 4 · 1 1

No Yes

2007-09-15 08:55:29 · answer #7 · answered by Jay P 7 · 0 0

Sounds like a fun sport. How do you do it?

I got one too! How about swimming waterskiing?

2007-09-15 00:53:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers