English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just curious... I need to que my old vhs recorder so I can tape it.

2007-09-14 15:41:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

US newspapers are writing about the plans to attack Iran, just like they did way before Iraq was attacked... So you can say I got a heads up a year ahead that last time... Just curious if I shall take these rumors/news seroius this time aswell...

2007-09-16 07:01:38 · update #1

21 answers

The attack will take place on the 15th of November.
America has already deployed a naval task-force including two aircraft carriers and many cruise missile carrying ships in the zone and strategic nuclear and chemical weapons are stocked and ready for use in a nearby "friendly" country.(Horn of Africa).
Attacks on strategic targets in Teheran and other Iranian cities, aswell as other military targets are already planned and several thousand special forces troops are already operating in and around Iran gathering intelligence and preparing sabotage missions.
750,000 troops, 1750 main-battle tanks, 2250 other armoured vehicles, large quantities of heavy and medium artillery, several hundred fighter-bombers, a large number of helicopters and other aircraft are, as you read this, being deployed to Saudi Arabia while another 450,000 troops will be brought up to battle readiness in the weeks to come.
France,Germany, Italy,Spain and are among countries that have already secretly pledged support in what is now believed to be the biggest military build-up since D-day.

2007-09-15 11:16:28 · answer #1 · answered by kisser 4 · 2 0

if it does happen you don`t need your VHS recorder you`ll be liable to see the action 1st hand
Theres a world of difference between virtually defenceless countries like Afghanistan and Iraq who had no allies and were already on their knees before being attacked
And Iran which has strong allies .Do you people seriously believe that Russia and China given the distrust they have of the US would stand back while America attacked Iran The Iranian president is visiting China for discussions this week
Beijing has echoed Moscow's opposition to UN action against Iran. After concluding the historic gas and oil deal between China and Iran in October 2004, China's Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing announced that China would not support UN Security Council action against Iran's nuclear energy program. Opposition in Moscow and Beijing to UN action against Iran is significant because both countries hold UN Security Council veto power.
i can not believe that some people on here could be so naive as to think that an aggression against Iran would be over in a couple of weeks
a more likely out come would be the start of WW3 with no.one from Europe on Americas side , even the idiots from the UK government wouldn`t go against European law on this one given that its been accepted by almost every country that Iran is complying with the un inspectors now

2007-09-14 17:05:20 · answer #2 · answered by keny 6 · 4 0

Six months or so ago a little man from the Pentigon said that the aim is to set up a large enough force in Iraq to be able to invaid Iran in early 2008. This probably means that many more inocent women and children will be slaughtered in the name of "oh that was just an accident".. Why don`t the rest of the world tell the American to get back in their own country?

2007-09-15 06:29:57 · answer #3 · answered by Terry M 5 · 2 0

I would not sit around waiting.

The US generally only attacks weak, small, and poorly
defended countries.

And of those exploits, the US loses, or draws a stalemate
more often than it wins any meaningfull, originally planned, lasting strategic objective, or what some might consider decisive "victory.:"

In cases like Vietnam, we proceed to train our enemies
and cultivate their ability to effectively deal with and eventually
over come our overwhelming fire power advantage, so we can eventually run away with our tails between our legs, beaten and humiliated.

That seems to be the plan for Afghanistan, and Iraq as well.

LuvUall, Ba-bye.

2007-09-14 15:57:19 · answer #4 · answered by max c 4 · 3 1

Especially after Iraq, America would be exceptionally foolish to militarily attack Iran. I doubt if the failed Bush regime have the ability to kick that one off and ever get off the hook.

2007-09-14 15:58:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

It will happen within 8 to 10 months according to our experts.

We are running out of time to stop the mad men in Iran from starting another Holocaust. Pentagon report states it will destroy the entire Iranian military in about 3 days. I think it will take at least 2 weeks. Either way, it will have to happen. The alternatives are far to frightening.

2007-09-14 16:03:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The US military maintains attack plans and keeps them updated for ALL potential threats.

There is no date on the plans, because it is simply a potential plan, not one in force.

2007-09-14 15:45:23 · answer #7 · answered by John T 6 · 3 0

We have made plans to attack every country in the world and to defend this one.

2007-09-14 15:52:18 · answer #8 · answered by John C 4 · 0 1

and people wonder why the world is in a state. the US are no better then the Muslims. their egotistical war is having a detrimental effect on millions of innocent people, and bringing the whole world into a state of devastation!

you record your news event and enjoy.

2007-09-14 16:15:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Yes but would have to kill you if I told you..Are you out of your mind?????No one is going to tell you that if they knew...but why dont you go wait at a beach,,nice vacation and have front row seats if and when the Marines show up...be part of history...it coul dbe a long wait though.

2007-09-14 15:50:57 · answer #10 · answered by Bob D 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers