Can anyone give 100% proof that particle to person evolution took place, without an intelligent designer?

Question

Face it folks, evolution is not grounded on science, but on the belief or desire that there is no god. I've read the books and there is nothing there but a whole lot of, " I postulate", " maybe this or that". No hard evidence.

I can find lots of manuscript, archaeological, historical, and philosophical evidence to support the claims of the Bible, especially the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Not one shred of hard evidence exists to show that the universe, planet Earth, zebras, people, fleas or even subatomic particles just came out of nothing.

BTW, Christians believe the Biblical account of creation because we believe in the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, an event that is an historical fact.

IT TAKES MORE FAITH TO BELIEVE THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION THAN IT TAKES TO BELIEVE THE BIBLE.

Please note, no one has answered the question, just insults. Why am I not shocked?

Answer 1

I don't know what "particle to person" means... unless you're asking about abiogenesis.

Are you asking for proof of evolution AND abiogenesis? Oh, and I suppose you'll want to know about the Big Bang as you seem to entirely misunderstand it (as evidenced by your assertion that everything couldn't've "came out of nothing").

If you want to know the REAL science behind the Big Bang, visit these links:
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/seuforum/bigbanglanding.htm
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bb2.html
http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=23699

If you'd like to learn more about abiogenesis, visit these links:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/modorlife.html
http://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/Exobiology/miller.html

If you'd like to learn more about evolution, visit these links:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-intro-to-biology.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_evolution
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/
http://talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
http://members.aol.com/darwinpage/hominid.htm
http://nationalacademies.org/evolution/
http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF
http://www.notjustatheory.com/index.html
http://wilstar.net/theories.htm

Answer 2

Dude, you can witness evolution every time a strain of bacteria becomes resistant to an antibiotic. Evolution happens, whether you want to admit it or not. It doesn't involve faith at all ... just a little bit of brain power.

And no, you can't find any evidence that Jesus resurrected, or that God created the universe, in any place outside your Bible. They're MYTHS. (And there were other creation myths long before that.) A spirit did not blow on a pile of dirt and create human beings. A man did not return from the dead. It's IMPOSSIBLE.

You really should read up on evolutionary theory. It's nothing to be afraid of. Even the Catholic church has accepted evolution.

Evolution is not rooted in the desire for there to be no God. It's simply the way things are, regardless of whether any gods exist or not, and regardless of whether you want it to be true or not.

EDIT: You see no answers among the replies? Wow, you really are thick. Persecution complex much? Are you even reading the replies? Dreamstuff gave you a very thorough answer. But you couldn't be bothered to read that, now, could you? It might shake up your little insular fantasy world too much.

Answer 3

this is fairly elementary. The extra like a stick a supermodel seems, the fewer in all threat that's to be seen by a predator. because of the fact of that the main stick like stick bugs survived and controlled to reproduce at the same time as the others did no longer. this is survival of the fittest at this is maximum elementary. %. up a e book and study. there is countless literature on the subject. Richard Dawkins - The God delusion would be a solid commencing element as ha explains all of it intimately that i'm no longer able to. Your place is improper because you haven't any longer any data. you're doing what the non secular have achieved for hundreds of years. in case you do no longer understand something, assume this is god. Josh V; faith isn't a thought. A thought is formed from data. a similar ****ING way. heavily, plenty extra clever human beings than you're having this communicate with plenty extra clever human beings than me. Do you somewhat think of which you would be the only to disprove evolution? Now i'm out, because you're initiating to **** me off.

Answer 4

faith is not science or fact either. why, the very word "faith" denies fact. faith is not a synonym for knowledge. i could find evidence of ufo's if i wanted to, it does not prove their existence. i find it hilarious that you call the resurrection a historic fact. where is the hard evidence? the bible doesn't count. i'm talking actual stuff. darwin's published works were not penned by the very hand of god, and neither was the bible. get off your religious high horse and take an OBJECTIVE look at the world around you.

Answer 5

Wait, wait, wait. Asinine question aside for a moment…you can find historic (ie – non-biblical) accounts of Jesus’ resurrection? You can find something modern scholars and contemporary historians had no ability to?

Could you…could you maybe share some of these historic (ie – non-biblical) accounts? Some of the archaeological proofs might be nice, too…if you don’t mind.

P.S. – Is “philosophical evidence” a contradictory term? Doesn't it cease to exist as philosophy once it becomes fact?

Answer 6

Of course not because it never did and never will exist! Take a look at 2 Peter 3:3-6...Most importantly, I want to remind you that in the last days scoffers will come, mocking the truth and following their own desires. They will say, "What happened to the promise that Jesus is returning again? From before the times of our ancestors, everything has remained the same since the world was first created." (Now for the important part!!) They deliberately forget that God made the heavens by the word of His command, and He brought the earth from out of the water and surrounded it with water. Then He used the water to destroy the ancient world with a mighty flood."

I just have one question...Do those who believe in macro-evolution realize that they are fulfilling a prophecy and showing that the end times are here?

Answer 7

Can you give even .000001% proof of the existence of your imaginary god? Didn't think so.

What evidence do you imagine you've found for the resurrection? Not even the four gospels agree on what happened, which suggests most of them are made up.

You are willfully ignorant on the subject of evolution, and therefore unqualified to comment on it. Do some real research, and not just from creationist websites.

Dreamstuff Entity and Zero Cool have answered your question astonishingly well, you just don't want to listen. Doesn't your imaginary god supposedly have a problem with lying?

Answer 8

THIS IS VERY WELL PUT. READ UP ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN ON THE LATEST SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT THIS WAS THE BURIAL CLOTH ON A CRUCIFIED MAN IN THE FIRST CENTURY. THE BLOOD IS NOT PAINT AND IS TYPE AB BLOOD. ALSO THE SCARS CORRESPOND WITH THE BIBLE OF THE WOUNDS OF JESUS. NOW SCIENTIST, NOT THEOLOGIANS, ARE SAYING THAT THE IMPRINT COULD PROVE THE BODY TURNED TO LIGHT AS THE SAME REACTION AS A NUCLEAR BLAST. I MEAN THERE AREN'T MUCH TO PROVE GEORGE WASHINGTON , ALEXANDER THE GREAT, ETC ETC ETC.

ALSO BIOGENESIS WOULD ALSO BE A GREAT ARGUMENT AGAINST EVOLUTION.

Answer 9

Um no. By definition a theory can never be "proven 100%". But the theory of evolution is one of the most supported theories there are. It is also the only theory as to explain the variety of species.

It doesn't take faith, but an education in science to accept the theory of evolution. Everyone I have met who didn't accept evolution turned out to be ignorant to the science behind evolution. I've never met someone educated on the science who didn't also accept the theory.

Answer 10

"Christians believe the Biblical account of creation because we believe in the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, an event that is an historical fact." ???? WHAT

Please I ask one question for someone to define for me what constititus a Historical Fact

please Note that I agree with this lovely evidence . as well as we all Know the Global Warming is a direct result of the decline of Pirates ... as can be seen in the attached

Answer 11

Let's take this poopsicle you call a question...

First, sort out your understanding of science. There is no proof of ANYTHING, and nobody ever said that there was. That's not how it works. Science attempts to answer questions as best as it can, and "godditit" isn't the best we can do. You likely already knew that science doesn't attempt to answer with 100% proof, and using it so brazenly in an argument takes some cojones.

Secondly, evolution does not deal with the origin of life (creation) at all. Nada. Zip. It is concerned with how life changed AFTER it was created.

Thirdly, I ask you right now to produce a shred of evidence for any Biblical miracle - let's take the ressurrection. And no, the Bible doesn't count as a primary source - it doesn't offer anything except for a silly verse, and it's going to take a bit more than that to convince me.

Also, it is a complete non-sequitur to say that "we believe in creation, so we believe in the ressurrection". The two aren't mutually inclusive, or mutually exclusive.

Finally, evolution - the process - is a fact. It has been observed. There is all sorts of empirical evidence to show that it happens. The THEORY attempts to explain HOW the process occurs.

And to keep it clear, in science, "Theory" does not mean "unsubstantiated guess". It means something along the lines of "a body of evidence that together forms a possible answer to a difficult question".

And by the way, invalidating evolution doesn't by default prove ID/Creationism, it simply disproves evolution. Give me one piece of evidence - an not an argument ad incredulum - that the Abrahamic God created you and me.

EDIT:
Of course nobody can answer the question, you imbecile, because the question can't be answered. You ask for 100% proof of evolution which, by definition, is utterly impossible. People are answering the questions in the body of your post, asking for you to produce evidence that you claim you possess, and criticizing statements that you made. That's pretty valid.