Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has recently been studying horses, and discovered that they conclusively disprove evolution. The reason for this is that horses could not possibly have evolved.
Em Adjineri has discovered that the horse is simply a hornless unicorn that is not magical. Therefore, horses must have evolved from unicorns. However, no unicorn fossils have ever been found, and even the most ardent evolutionists will reluctantly deny that unicorns have ever existed.
This proves that horses could not have evolved from unicorns. If they didn't evolve from unicorns, the only alternative explanation is that horses were created by God. God created horses so that humans would have something to race while they were riding it.
If God created horses, then the Bible must be literally true because it says that God created animals. (I know this is a false syllogism but I'm ignoring that fact because it hurts my argument.)
Take that, equinelutionists!
2007-09-14 08:42:31 · 46 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Quailman: Em Adjineri is an "Em Adjineri" person. Say it out loud and it'll make sense.
2007-09-14 08:57:56 · update #1
What are you, some kinda neigh-sayer??? Whinny you guys gonna learn?
2007-09-14 08:45:38 · answer #1 · answered by Acorn 7 · 21⤊ 1⤋
Actually they have found earlier horses and they have evolved although not from unicorns. And if you're using the Bible as a reference regarding unicorns and other "mythical" creatures, check out these:
Job 39:9-10
Psalms 22:21, 29:6, 44:19, 74:13-14, 91:13, 92:10
Jeremiah 9:11, 14:6, 49:33, 51:37
2007-09-14 08:48:32 · answer #2 · answered by Keltasia 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Im sorry to state otherwise but equine evolution is one of the better and most complete fossil records that exist.
There is clear evidence of the horses evolution as follows:
60million Yrs Ago: Hydracotherum, A 4 fingered 'hoof' very small
40million yrs Ago: Mesophippus A 3 large fingered 'hoof' Small
30 Million yrs Ago: Merrychippus: 2 small fingers one large forming a 'hoof' Medium
10 Million yrs Ago: Pliohippus: more modern hoof shape, 2 small fingers have recided to the joint
Present: Equus: Modern Hoof, vestigial fingers are existent though completely receded within the joint
The reason for the lack of 'Unicorn' fossils being non-existent is because the animals never existed.
Also is this question a serious one?
2007-09-14 08:53:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
ah, but your scientist missed on important point, in 1985 it was determined that unicorns were in fact goats.
here is the abstract and a link if you wish to purchase the entire article.
"FREE PREVIEW | Permissions
NEW YORK DAY BY DAY;
Unmasking the Unicorns
*Please Note: Archive articles do not include photos, charts or graphics. More information. April 11, 1985, Thursday
By SUSAN HELLER ANDERSON AND DAVID W. DUNLAP (NYT); Metropolitan Desk
Late City Final Edition, Section B, Page 5, Column 2, 294 words
DISPLAYING ABSTRACT - Caught on the dilemmas of a horn, the chief Federal veterinarian in New York State has concluded that ''unicorns'' are, in fact, goats. The veterinarian, Dr. Gerald Toms, made his remarks yesterday after a Tuesday-night examination of the four one-horned animals brought to Madison Square Garden by the Ringling ..."
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70916F7385C0C728DDDAD0894DD484D81&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fSubjects%2fC%2fCircuses
2007-09-14 08:50:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Indeed. God is the Creator of all things. He created the Horse and all living things.
Genesis
Colossians 1:16
Isaiah 45:18
Hebrews 11:3
Psalm 24:1-3
John 1:1-4
Have faith dear friends in GOD.
2007-09-14 09:56:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's pretty obvious that Dr. Adjineiri is not familiar with the seminal work done by Dr. Hal Lusynajin wherein it is conclusively proven that horses were made by an unknown intelligent designer using the spare parts from sea horses and hippopotami (which translates from the Greek as "water horses").
So there. take THAT, aquaequinelutionalist!
2007-09-14 08:53:37 · answer #6 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Not taking sides either way, that is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Wouldn't a unicorn losing it's horn DEvolving?
This unicorn theory holds no weight. Why did a horse HAVE to come from a unicorn?
2007-09-14 08:48:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Dude, thats so stupid. Because no unicorn fossils were found the bible is true. Sure, I'm totally on board with your logic. So if Nessie or sasquach are found does that also prove the bible is true?
2007-09-14 08:54:27 · answer #8 · answered by danzahn 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The famous Romanian Paleoanthropologist Ceilie Boulsheat would concur with that assessment.
Ten points Slytherin.
2007-09-14 08:53:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Ha I bet God made the made the magical unicorn but it just didn't reach noahs ark in time. Of course there is loads of proof that God exists.
2007-09-14 08:51:25 · answer #10 · answered by Monkey Man 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Very funny - I actually smiled. Unfortunately many people won't realise your question is satirical. Try to aim a little bit lower next time, as you have gone over the heads of most of your audience.
Otherwise, keep up the good smirk.
2007-09-14 08:49:05 · answer #11 · answered by Dharma Nature 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋