Why are non-Catholics afraid of these titles given to Mary, the Virgin Mother of Jesus? She was the very first Christian and the very first Disciple. She freely said "yes" to God's will and to His Word, when she could have said "No."
Had Mary said "No," Jesus would not have come down from Heaven, and thus our salvation would be in jeopardy. That is a scary thought.
These titles given to Mary are nothing to be afraid of. "For no creature could ever be counted as equal with the Incarnate Word and Redeemer. Just as the priesthood of Christ is shared in various ways both by the ministers and by the faithful, and as the one goodness of God is really communicated in different ways to His creatures, so also the unique mediation of the Redeemer does not exclude but rather gives rise to a manifold cooperation which is but a sharing in this one source." (Second Vatican Council; Chapter 8, Dogmatic Constitution of the Church; November 21, 1964)
2007-09-14
06:18:32
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
LineDancer, are not all Christians called to bring the Light of Christ to all? Is this not, in fact, a means of participating with Christ in His redemptive work?
2007-09-14
08:02:43 ·
update #1
Onesimus, did you read the passage that I posted in the details, which clearly explains what is meant by those titles? Apparently not. Peace be with you. By the way, why did Paul call Onesimus his child, thus implying he was the father, in direct opposition to the fundmentalist interpretation of Jesus' admonition against calling any man a father?
2007-09-14
10:05:37 ·
update #2
This is just another example of misunderstanding of language that catholics use. Non-Catholics place their own definition to word we use and come to the wrong conclusions.
By leading us to Jesus Christ, Mary is participating in the redeeming and mediaing work of Jesus. As Christians, we are ALL called to do this.
It is easier to misunderstand than to ask questions and try to understand. I am sure that Catholics do this in regards to non-Catholics as well.
2007-09-14 06:55:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sldgman 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
You do understand that that's between the main over-asked questions we get suitable? We answer this question quite a few cases an afternoon and if I see it greater advantageous than three times an afternoon, i do no longer answer through fact what's the use? no person seems to work out that little icon that pops up and says "Wait! we would desire to already have the respond you're finding for!" i'm no longer uncomfortable approximately this coaching in any respect. we are actually not worshipping the Saints or Mary. we are purely asking them to intercede our prayers for us. this is like asking a pal to desire for you once you're dealing with a coarse time. you're asking the chum to desire for you, no longer worshipping the chum. there's a definite distinction between worshipping and honoring. We have faith that the Saints and Mary are in heaven, alongside with our kinfolk. So what greater ideal human beings to intercede our prayers for us. with reference to the verse which you shared, you probably did no longer examine the completed element. The 4 verses previous it says,"at the start, then, i beg that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all adult adult males, for kings and all who're in intense positions, that we could lead on a quiet and non violent existence, godly and respectful in each and every way. that's sturdy, and ideal to God our Savior, who desires all adult adult males to be stored and to return to the certainty of the actuality." Intercessory prayers on behalf of others are "sturdy and ideal to God." you besides mght misunderstand Christ being human's mediator. he's truly unique through fact he's the only guy or woman to be the two God and guy. consequently he's the only one that bridges the two at the same time. Christ is the mediator of the hot Covenant purely as Moses grew to become into the mediator of the previous Covenant.
2016-11-10 10:44:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with everydaycatholic...
Because Protestants are comfortable with interpreting scripture with their own understanding of the world, they have no problem interpreting Catholicism in the same way. They read or hear something and attach a particular meaning to it and decide based on their own perception that it MUST be what they think it is. It's really a very arrogant way to approach anything.
If one were to actually READ what is meant by these titles and terms and how the Catholic Church understands each of these, they may be surprised to find out the Church is really right on.
2007-09-14 08:07:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Misty 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
But 'co-redemptrix' implies far more than just 'sharing the Gospel, dearie.
If Rome officially takes that course, it can no longer claim to be a Christian religion.
2007-09-14 09:08:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Those are unscriptural titles that were applied to Mary, as if Jesus needed help in his role as mediator. 2 Tim. 2:5: “There is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man Christ Jesus, who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all.”
The Roman Catholic Church has elevated Mary to where she now stands in a position of equality with God in that church and performs the functions of both Jesus Christ and the holy spirit. The queenship of Mary is not determined by any reference to the Bible or to Christ. It is founded solely upon the traditions and authority of the Roman Catholic Church.
Roman Catholic theologians represent Mary as coredeemer and comediatrix with Christ. She is seen performing many functions that, in the Christian Greek Scriptures, are exclusively associated with Jesus Christ and the holy spirit. Nations are being urged to call upon Mary in their hour of danger, difficulties and doubts. The attention and devotion given to Mary in the Roman Catholic world now equal, even exceed, that given to Jesus Christ.
The activities of Jesus Christ are being removed farther away from direct contact with human life by Catholic authorities. Christ is being regarded as living aloof from mankind. He is no longer seen as the only One who intercedes before God in behalf of fallen humankind. Mary now is pictured as the copartner and cointercessor, transmitting prayers from earth to God. In fact, in all that has to do with salvation, with the achievement of human welfare and the establishment of peace on earth, Mary figures as prominently as does Jesus Christ.
If Mary performs the above functions, what is there left for God and Christ to do? If Mary intercedes, directs and teaches mankind, what is the assigned work of the holy spirit? If Mary occupies the foremost position in our hearts, what place does God occupy? Does not the elevation of Mary obscure the headship and activities of Christ over his church? Does not it minimize his earnest and undying concern for the members of his church body and for all who call upon him in spirit and in truth? Is not all this glorifying of Mary unscriptural?
The apostle Peter sums up regarding Christ Jesus: “There is no salvation in anyone else, for there is not another name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must get saved.” Let these inspired words of God, not the traditions of men, guide you in your worship. Col. 2:8; Gal. 1:8; Acts 4:12
The thumbs down I received indicate that Catholics put more faith in the traditions of the Church than in what the Bible says.
2007-09-14 07:09:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by LineDancer 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
Sorry, but I'm not catholic!!
2007-09-16 08:26:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by U Rock My World MJ♥™ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋