2007-09-14 00:04:23 · 7 answers · asked by winslow o.velez 1 in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Infectious Diseases
Of course not. People have a right to procreate, even those with disabilities. Just because a person has a disease that's genetic, doesn't always mean that his/her offspring will inherit it. Many times there is a 75% or 50% chance that the child will be perfectly normal and not inherit the parents genetic deficiencies. And there are many genetic disorders that are so minor, such as color blindness. Would you desire to prevent a color blind person from reproducing? Where do you draw the line? You can't. Sounds like you'd like to see a perfect race, and it ain't gonna happen in this lifetime.
2007-09-14 00:29:55 · answer #1 · answered by ~RedBird~ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is a personal choice that I think really depends on what type of mutation we are talking about. There are a lot of options out there now a days...
if you are asking if they should be required to become sterile, then, of course the answer is no.
However, If I carried the gene for Huntington's or certain blood clotting disorders, etc. I would choose to adopt rather than pass that on to my child.
2007-09-14 00:24:09 · answer #2 · answered by dedum 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everyone has genetic disorders that we don't know about so the answer would be no. Just because we have a genetic disorder does not mean we should not have children. It's a personal choice and one that EVERYONE should get the chance to make.
2007-09-14 00:37:17 · answer #3 · answered by lisa_sonydadc 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, stupid and ineffective people according to danger. yet being grotesque is punctiliously suitable in case you serve a effective objective in society. I lots quite be surrounded by ability of grotesque individuals than morons who merely take in area. even even with the shown fact that it quite is annoying to pay attention those grotesque mum and dad communicate approximately how beautiful their butt grotesque offspring is. no longer even the wonderful hollywood makeup artist interior the rustic ought to help the genetics of those undesirable misfortunate young little ones.
2016-11-15 05:03:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. Some genetic mutations happened for a reason and were beneficial at some point. You never know if they will be again.
2007-09-14 00:11:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you could have something that would be discovered next year or ten years later!
2007-09-14 15:23:24 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oooh that is a rather Hitlereques kind of question.
2007-09-14 00:24:42 · answer #7 · answered by ll_jenny_ll here AND I'M BAC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋