How would Atheists justify their non-belief if science was to prove God was real.?

Question

Would they deny science?

Answer 1

I agree with Tony’s answer, God Almighty is as solid as a rock, He does not waver; He is the same always and forever. †

Answer 2

"How would Atheists justify their non-belief if science was to prove God was real?"

I can't speak for "atheists," plural, but for myself I can: the question which must be asked before yours is answered is, How would science 'prove' that there exists an invisible, supernatural god who lives somewhere in the clouds, and though he has such duties as tending to trillions of galaxies (which he created) in each of which are trillions of stars (which he created)...yet he has time to watch a lonely teenage kid down in godforsaken Iowa touching himself?

Answer 3

You'd have to define God first, and science would have to have created a definition that fits what others consider God.

However, if there were a reputable, controlled study that passed peer review and was able to present findings that were repeatable, then I would of course begin to believe in God.

But the fact that none of these conditions have ever been met simply adds to the evidence against the existence of God.

^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^

Answer 4

to respond to your question: "If we at last locate info that shows that the concept of Evolution is faulty, ought to human beings pass back to believing in God"? the quick answer is, no, human beings shouldn't. The longer answer: First, the possibility that info will floor that shows the concept of evolution and or organic determination is fake is extremely no longer likely. this is not purely Darwin's artwork that we turn to. this is the completed field of the organic and organic sciences that helps the claims of organic determination. evaluate the recent form of recent variations of previous viruses coming back and the actuality that antibiotics (like penicillin) have become much less effective and are actually being administered in greater doses than ever till now. this is through fact antibiotics at one factor have been so effective that they killed surprisingly much all viral infections. surprisingly much all of them. What surpassed off after it truly is small strains that have been resistant had room to multiply and improve into dominant, and we now have great bugs. Examples like those are each and every interior the learn of organic biology. we are on the factor the place mankind is beginning as much as regulate the determination technique ourselves. look at dogs. human beings breed dogs of all sizes and shapes that would possibly in no way have happened interior the organic worldwide. i can take a dachsund and a min pin and breed them for a pair of generations, and if adequate human beings like the hot "wiener pinscher" then it could improve into primary and greater of its sort will come into life. Even then, if info have been to floor (it would ought to be an undesirable lot of info) for the scientific community to invalidate each and all the previous study, it truly is not any reason to pass back to believing in something completely on faith. Taking something on faith is fairly taking an unverifiable place that has no rational theory in the back of it. there is not any reason to make judgements in keeping with much less suggestion.

Answer 5

Even if you proved God to be real, and that's saying it's YOUR God, I still wouldn't believe in him. I don't like to think that someone else is controlling my life, and I like to know that all the accomplishments I make in this lifetime are because of my efforts, not because some man made it that way.

Might I add, when I say believe, I mean worship, not believe as in, knowing it's real.

//EDIT//
Oh lordy, am I the only one that would stay an atheist?
then again, I guess I wouldn't be an atheist per se, just a nonbeliever.

Answer 6

If science was to "prove" God, that object of their proof would not be God, as God is that which nothing greater can be thought, and cannot be circumscribed by a finite construct.

Answer 7

If it's proven by science, then of course I'd believe it...

But if people with Bibles are the ones running the quiz show, then no...

(I'm not really an Atheist, but still...)

Answer 8

What makes you think we would need to justify our non-belief? I wouldn't justify it. I don't have belief of god. What's to justify? That I'm human?

Answer 9

personally, i wouldn't. science doesn't really do "proof" but to the extent that science is able to produce evidence and a credible theory of godology to explain it, i would know (not believe) that god is real. now, when are you theists going to get around to providing this evidence?

Answer 10

rofl. I don't have to justify it. I truly don't think that god exists. If science were to prove there's a god, I'd have to amend that thought. So what? I don't base my entire existance on "god doesn't exist", unlike Christians who base their entire existance on "god exists" so, for me, it would mean very little.

I still wouldn't worship the god, especially if he's the Christian god.

Answer 11

If it was proven by science there wouldn't be any atheists.