Is eating meat causing global warming?

Question

Are all those cows contributing to global warming? This is what Al Gore says as he boards his luxurious-oversized private jet. What about poultry?

Soon it will be shown (unscientifically of course) that eating plants causes global warming as well.

Answer 1

are you stupid or something no that is not part of the cause of global warming

Answer 2

It's not just global warming...producing animals for food with the methods we use today and in such massive amounts is horrible for the enviornment all around. Poultry is just as bad as beef, too, maybe not if you're only concerned about global warming but you would be a very bad environmentalist if you only focused on one issue. Poultry is so bad that the state of Oklahoma is bringing a lawsuit against the poultry industry for pollution of lakes and rivers. The only solution besides everyone going vegetarian is to eat less meat (better for your health too) and produce it on a small scale, on local organic farms and/or practice controlled hunting and fishing.

Oh, and since you mention plants, I just want to point out that consuming animals uses more plants than does consuming the plants directly (the animals eat as much as you do). Animals as food are a very inefficient use of resources.

Answer 3

Cows and all other ruminant animals contribute to global warming, this has been known about for a long time.

When you fart most of the gas you expel is nitorgen, most of the remainder is methane. Methane is a greenhouse gas and by volume is 23 times as potent as carbon dioixide.

Ruminants have a complex digestive system that produces substantial amounts of methane which is released when they belch and fart. An average humans produces about 0.5 litres of fart gas per day, the average cow produces about 600 litres.

If we reduced meat consumption then farmers would breed fewer animals and there would be less farting going on.

Just under a fifth of methane released as a result of human activities comes from the agricultural industry and most of this is from animals burping and farting. In total it accounts for about 1.5% of the overall contribution to global warming.

Answer 4

once you eat much less meat, you withdraw help for the fairly unsustainable farm animals industry. The farm animals industry contributes to worldwide warming by emitting countless greenhouse gases. one million) Cows are ruminants, which propose they have a digestive equipment which leads them to fart plenty (i'd too with 4 stomachs), and the gasoline they fart is pronounced as methane. some would chortle on the thought cows farting would be contributing to worldwide warming, yet once you think approximately there are extra cows than human beings, interior the billions, and that methane warms the ambience 23 circumstances extra powerfully than carbon - it figures. 2) As worldwide places advance into extra greater and choose extra meat of their weight loss plan, extra land desires to make way for farm animals, so forests (like the Amazon rain woodland in Brazil) are cleared and as a result, those burnt trees launch carbon into the ambience as they're burned, and of course are actually not any further soaking up carbon of their growth. Hmm, sounds like we could continuously eat monkeys rather - a minimum of we does no longer could decrease down the forests. 3)and then there is all that manure, which releases a greenhouse gasoline pronounced as nitrous oxide, a whopping 296 the international warming means of carbon dioxide. besides that, there are the emissions on the subject of starting to be their feed, producing fertilisers for the feed, besides as seperate yet appropriate environmental issues like soil erosion, eutrophication, water pollution and water shortage, degradation of coral reefs, phew! Yep, ingesting much less meat or maybe going vegan, decrease than the preparation of a dietician, you're able to do far extra for our survival.

Answer 5

Meat eating is a problem today but so are so many other things humans consume on a regular basis. Just think about it, there are just as many people in China today as there were in the entire world at the turn of the twentieth century. Will consumption of our resources make a difference today? You betcha!

Consider that one out of every five people on earth is Chinese and that the average Chinese will want to consume and have the same standard of living as the average American. Will that put a strain on the worlds resources? You betcha!

Vegetarianism is probably the only way we can feed so many people if all people are going to have the same standard of living. It may lead to deficiencies in zinc and iron and certain amino acids, but how else can we feed everybody without using so much land and so many resources? We can't. We are depleting this planet so fast that we have to look at all options.

I'm not a proponent of vegetarianism because I don't think we are tackling the central issue, only the symptom. But we must take global warming seriously if we are going to survive as a species. We don't have much time.

Answer 6

Eating meat is not causing Global Warming, but it is causing a the dead to walk the Earth in search of anybody holding the March 1967 Popular Science. Beware...

Answer 7

Yes, by deforestation on a massive scale to 'meat' the Western world's massive overconsumption.

A major source of land and water degradation.

Livestock now uses 30% of land surface.

In Latin America some 70% of Former forests have been turned over to live stock grazing

In 2004-2005 all the wild animals and trees in 2.9 million acres of rainforest were destroyed in the name of the livestock industry - to produce monocrops to feed chickens.

This video is slow, but watch it, very interesting particularly the figures!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWWNLvgU4MI

Answer 8

This just in, just talking about global warming causes global warming!

Answer 9

More accurately, eating beef is contributing to global warming, as cows are ruminant animals (which means they produce methane, a greenhouse gas) which require large tracts of land for pasture (which means less land for forests). Poultry is a non-issue in terms of global warming. There is nothing unscientific about this, and it's not a new finding. I have some discussions about the issue linked below. You should especially appreciate the second one.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=As6MMc8lLk5ZrMSOAhywS77sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20070904123859AAhh6Iw
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ahj_9Ts6XCPlEPR8x0ZiSSPsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20070905112410AAY1IqC

Answer 10

PETA at work at one time there were 1000 times more buffalo then there are cows today. and they did not cause global warming

Answer 11

For many years i said the main cause harming the o-zone layer was cows and volcano's, and i was laughed at. Now the animal lovers don't want us to eat meat , what a bunch of Lonnie's